1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0029-5493(96)01279-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ex-vessel boiling experiments: laboratory- and reactor-scale testing of the flooded cavity concept for in-vessel core retention Part II: Reactor-scale boiling experiments of the flooded cavity concept for in-vessel core retention

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The CYBL experiment carried out by Chu et al (1997) used a pressure vessel with a ratio of 1:1 to conduct an experimental study on the boiling heat transfer and flow process in the external cooling process. Different from the AP600/1,000 reactor pressure vessel, the lower head of the RPV in the CYBL experiment is an ellipsoid structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CYBL experiment carried out by Chu et al (1997) used a pressure vessel with a ratio of 1:1 to conduct an experimental study on the boiling heat transfer and flow process in the external cooling process. Different from the AP600/1,000 reactor pressure vessel, the lower head of the RPV in the CYBL experiment is an ellipsoid structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This measure is adopted in low and medium power reactors, such as the AP600, the AP1000 [3,4], the Loviisa nuclear power plant [5], and the KERENA [6] as a design feature for severe accident mitigation, and in the high-power reactors of the APR (Advanced Power Reactor) 1400 and the APR + (Advanced Power Reactor Plus) as an accident management strategy [7][8][9]. Many studies have been performed to evaluate the IVR-ERVC [10][11][12][13], but more efforts are needed to solve the uncertainties of IVR-ERVC evaluation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4] This measure has been adopted in some low-power reactors such as the AP600 and the Loviisa nuclear power plants and in the highpower reactors of the AP1000 and the advanced power reactor (APR) 1400 as an accident management strategy for severe-accident mitigation with the aim of retaining the molten core material in-vessel. [5][6][7] However, it is known that the thermal margin between the volumetric heat source in the corium pool of the reactor's lower plenum and the heat transfer rate from the lower reactor vessel wall to the coolant in the reactor's cavity is not sufficient for a high-power reactor like the APR1400, unlike the low-power reactors of the AP600 and the Loviisa nuclear power plants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%