2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-20013-2_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ex-Situ Remediation Technologies for Environmental Pollutants: A Critical Perspective

Abstract: Pollution and the global health impacts from toxic environmental pollutants are presently of great concern. At present, more than 100 million people are at risk from exposure to a plethora of toxic organic and inorganic pollutants. This review is an exploration of the ex-situ technologies for cleaning-up the contaminated soil, groundwater and air emissions, highlighting their principles, advantages, deficiencies and the knowledge gaps. Challenges and strategies for removing different types of contaminants, mai… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
42
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 365 publications
(260 reference statements)
0
42
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Other physicochemical techniques are the use of dispersants, cleaners, emulsifiers, surfactants, soil oxidizers, abiotic transformations, and chemical inactivation (potassium permanganate/hydrogen peroxide are used as chemical oxidants to mineralize non-aqueous hydrocarbons) (Kuppusamy et al, 2016). Though, there is growing discussion about the practice of these techniques as they involve the relocation of contaminants away from the original site or produce secondary pollution (Bao et al, 2012;Ferradji et al, 2014).…”
Section: Biological Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other physicochemical techniques are the use of dispersants, cleaners, emulsifiers, surfactants, soil oxidizers, abiotic transformations, and chemical inactivation (potassium permanganate/hydrogen peroxide are used as chemical oxidants to mineralize non-aqueous hydrocarbons) (Kuppusamy et al, 2016). Though, there is growing discussion about the practice of these techniques as they involve the relocation of contaminants away from the original site or produce secondary pollution (Bao et al, 2012;Ferradji et al, 2014).…”
Section: Biological Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Any remedial efforts should be directed towards removing the risk rather than the contaminant (Reinikainen and Sorvari 2016). The traditional methods of remediation are based on excavation and subsequent disposal of the contaminated soil which is not only very expensive but does not eliminate the contaminant since it is only transferred to another site (Kuppusamy et al 2016b). Further, for any contaminant to pose risk it has to be in a bioavailable form, therefore, contaminant bioavailability plays a central role in any risk assessment (Van den Brink et al 2016).…”
Section: Risk-based Remediation Of Amls-a Sustainable Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The process of the Pseudofirst-order kinetic model has been used for adsorption of reversible with an equilibrium being established between adsorbate and adsorbent systems although the process of the Pseudo-second-order kinetic model demonstrates chemisorptions which control the adsorption such as Vander Waals, hydrogen bonding, ion exchange etc. 40 The process of 2,4-DCP adsorption in sweetgum bark may be chemisorptions. It is possible to see similar adsorbent performance for each of the three plots in initial concentrations 100, 150 and 200 ppm when they are compared with each other's in Pseudo-second-order plots.…”
Section: 1 Pseudo-first-order Model and Pseudo-second-order Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%