2002
DOI: 10.2737/pnw-gtr-528
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ex situ gene conservation for conifers in the Pacific Northwest.

Abstract: Recently, a group of public and private organizations responsible for managing much of the timberland in western Oregon and Washington formed the Pacific Northwest forest tree Gene Conservation Group (GCG) to ensure that the evolutionary potential of important regional tree species is maintained. The group is first compiling data to evaluate the genetic resource status of several species of conifers both at their original location (in situ) and at some other location (ex situ). We summarize the ex situ genetic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(13 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Spatial genetic substructure and past extinctions and recolonizations have probably reduced the effective population sizes (N e ) in all studied populations to levels considerably lower than those expected in panmictic populations with the same number of trees (Whitlock and Barton 1997). Conservation efforts are often more critical for tree species growing under severe environmental conditions and having small fragmented populations than for species of interest for tree improvement (Yanchuk 2001;Lipow et al 2002). All P. mugo populations in the Rila and Pirin Mountains fall within national parks and are protected from logging by law.…”
Section: Implications For Gene Conservation Of P Mugomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spatial genetic substructure and past extinctions and recolonizations have probably reduced the effective population sizes (N e ) in all studied populations to levels considerably lower than those expected in panmictic populations with the same number of trees (Whitlock and Barton 1997). Conservation efforts are often more critical for tree species growing under severe environmental conditions and having small fragmented populations than for species of interest for tree improvement (Yanchuk 2001;Lipow et al 2002). All P. mugo populations in the Rila and Pirin Mountains fall within national parks and are protected from logging by law.…”
Section: Implications For Gene Conservation Of P Mugomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The in situ genetic resources we evaluated are only one component of an overall gene conservation strategy (Yanchuk & Lester 1996; Lipow et al 2001). The tree species also have extensive genetic resources in ex situ collections, including progeny tests, seed orchards, and seed stores (Lipow et al 2001; S.R.L., K.V.‐B., J.B.S., J.A.H., & C.M., unpublished data). In Oregon and Washington, progeny from >1679 noble fir selections from natural populations are maintained in genetic tests or in 1 of 14 seed orchards.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%