Ex-ante Life Cycle Assessment approach developed for a case study on bio-based polybutylene succinate

Abstract

International audienceThe evaluation of the environmental impact of an innovative material at an early stage of development is of fundamental importance during the design phase of a product. In this regard, a full-fledged Life Cycle Assessment presents some major limitations: it can be performed mainly as an ex-post analysis, and it does not account for the intrinsic properties of the material. The growing need to compare the properties of new materials with those of industrially optimized ones poses further issues. For example, production at the lab/pilot scale cannot be directly compared to industrial systems, primarily due to the large discrepancy in the yields of the processes involved. In the present work, an ex-ante Life Cycle Assessment approach is proposed to forecast the environmental impact of a new material, overcoming the aforementioned issues. The most relevant added value of the proposed methodology lies in the use of primary data collected on lab/pilot scale systems alongside data simulated from thermo-chemical considerations. A scale-up protocol is thus detailed and then applied to the case of polybutylene succinate, a biopolymer that is gaining attention particularly as a replacement for polyolefins, and is obtained from bio-based succinic acid. Furthermore, a sensitivity analysis is used to evaluate and compare different renewable sources and chemical routes available for the production of bio-based succinic acid. Monte Carlo simulation is used to process the uncertainty data for all of the assessments. The case study of polybutylene succinate highlights the advantages of the adopted scale-up methodology with particular reference to the ease of implementation and consistency of results

How to Conduct Prospective Life Cycle Assessment for Emerging Technologies? A Systematic Review and Methodological Guidance

“…The topics of food production (n = 4), mobility (n = 2), and biomass production (n = 1) are analyzed as well. Most authors concluded that applying prospective LCA is useful, leads to new insights during the development of new technologies, and can support policymakers in their work [25,26,32,[34][35][36][37]. Zimmermann et al [27] expand this argument in concluding that prospective LCAs lead to a more robust analysis than traditional static LCAs.…”

LCA of 1,4-Butanediol Produced via Direct Fermentation of Sugars from Wheat Straw Feedstock within a Territorial Biorefinery

“…Regarding the environmental impacts of such a new bio-based chemical products, the life cycle assessment (LCA) represents an effective analytical tool [13,17,18]. All the direct and indirect environmental impacts associated with the product, process or activity are included in the assessment.…”

Eco-Efficiency Assessment of Bioplastics Production Systems and End-of-Life Options

“…Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) has been used as a tool to quantify environmental impacts associated with bioplastics throughout its life cycle. Some studies focused on 'cradle-to-factory gate' [10][11][12][13][14][15] LCA or from the feedstock cultivation and harvesting to bioplastic resin. However, some researchers studied the impacts from acquisition of feedstock to end-of-life (EOL) or 'cradle-to-grave' approach [14,16,17].…”