2022
DOI: 10.1111/pin.13293
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ewing and Ewing‐like sarcomas: A morphological guide through genetically‐defined entities

Abstract: The fifth edition of the World Health Organization classification of soft tissue and bone tumors redefined Ewing sarcoma by fusions between EWSR1/FUS and ETS family of transcription factors, and recognized three tumor groups among Ewing‐like sarcoma: CIC‐rearranged sarcoma, sarcoma with BCOR genetic alterations, and round cell sarcoma with EWSR1::non‐ETS fusions. Although this classification underscores the critical role of molecular genetics in the diagnosis of small round cell sarcoma, each entry is recogniz… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 93 publications
(277 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This emphasizes the significance of immunohistochemistry, particularly WT1 staining, incorrect diagnosis and differentiation of renal neoplasms. On the other hand, Ewing sarcoma has a homogeneous population of tiny round cells, robust nuclear expression of NKX2.2, and diffuse membrane expression of CD99, which is compatible with the diagnostic value of these markers, as described in earlier research [ 24 , 25 ]. The anatomic distribution of Ewing sarcoma in multiple places adds to the body of knowledge, underlining the necessity of these indicators in proper identification [ 26 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…This emphasizes the significance of immunohistochemistry, particularly WT1 staining, incorrect diagnosis and differentiation of renal neoplasms. On the other hand, Ewing sarcoma has a homogeneous population of tiny round cells, robust nuclear expression of NKX2.2, and diffuse membrane expression of CD99, which is compatible with the diagnostic value of these markers, as described in earlier research [ 24 , 25 ]. The anatomic distribution of Ewing sarcoma in multiple places adds to the body of knowledge, underlining the necessity of these indicators in proper identification [ 26 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…glands or keratinisation), and site‐specific immunohistochemical markers such as TTF1 should aid in assessment. EWSR1::NFATC2 sarcomas often demonstrate a corded or reticular growth pattern within fibromyxoid background and could be focally positive for keratin; however, they are often positive for PAX7, NKX2.2, and/or NKX3.1, 36 which is lacking in EMC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is likely that the last group does not represent a single entity because it includes tumors with a variety of fusions and phenotypes. 25 Managing the disease should start with neoadjuvant chemotherapy which represents the standard of care. Then comes a definitive radiation or surgery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%