“…Most of these have been concerned with multiple sequence alignments [1,12,13,17,18,25,27,32,36,37,42,44,[50][51][52][53][57][58][59]64,66,68,73], although a number have targeted other representations [20,28,29,33,34,39,40,56,60,63,65,71,72]. Most MSA approaches can be divided into two classes: those which directly evolve alignments e.g.…”
“…No direct comparison has yet been made against other promoter finding algorithms. A number of other researchers have also looked at how programmatic classifiers may be used for motif discovery [28,39,40,65]. Handley [28] has evolved GP expressions consisting of continuous numerical functions and left/right relative movement commands to recognise promoter regions in the E. coli genome.…”
“…Howard and Benson's GP-automata approach [33], for example, demonstrates a novel way of representing regulatory motifs and their interactions. However, more interesting are those approaches which break free of the regular expression mould, notably the use of Turing-complete classifiers by Koza et al [39] and Vallejo [65]. In this context, a Turing-complete classifier can be interpreted as a programmatic model of the biological interactions which lead to a particular motif or set of motifs; so, in essence, the GP approach is analogous to reverse-engineering the algorithm underlying the biological system.…”
Finding motifs -patterns of conserved residues -within nucleotide and protein sequences is a key part of understanding function and regulation within biological systems. This paper presents a review of current approaches to motif discovery, both evolutionary computation based and otherwise, and a speculative look at the advantages of the evolutionary computation approach and where it might lead us in the future. Particular attention is given to the problem of characterising regulatory DNA motifs and the value of expressive representations for providing accurate classification.
“…Most of these have been concerned with multiple sequence alignments [1,12,13,17,18,25,27,32,36,37,42,44,[50][51][52][53][57][58][59]64,66,68,73], although a number have targeted other representations [20,28,29,33,34,39,40,56,60,63,65,71,72]. Most MSA approaches can be divided into two classes: those which directly evolve alignments e.g.…”
“…No direct comparison has yet been made against other promoter finding algorithms. A number of other researchers have also looked at how programmatic classifiers may be used for motif discovery [28,39,40,65]. Handley [28] has evolved GP expressions consisting of continuous numerical functions and left/right relative movement commands to recognise promoter regions in the E. coli genome.…”
“…Howard and Benson's GP-automata approach [33], for example, demonstrates a novel way of representing regulatory motifs and their interactions. However, more interesting are those approaches which break free of the regular expression mould, notably the use of Turing-complete classifiers by Koza et al [39] and Vallejo [65]. In this context, a Turing-complete classifier can be interpreted as a programmatic model of the biological interactions which lead to a particular motif or set of motifs; so, in essence, the GP approach is analogous to reverse-engineering the algorithm underlying the biological system.…”
Finding motifs -patterns of conserved residues -within nucleotide and protein sequences is a key part of understanding function and regulation within biological systems. This paper presents a review of current approaches to motif discovery, both evolutionary computation based and otherwise, and a speculative look at the advantages of the evolutionary computation approach and where it might lead us in the future. Particular attention is given to the problem of characterising regulatory DNA motifs and the value of expressive representations for providing accurate classification.
“…Same as the case of the Sun Spot benchmark, the typical approach for this problem is to build a predictor based on the sliding window [7]. Lorenz Chaotic time series is defined over three variables by the discrete differential system, [11] 0.082 0.086 0.35 TAR [9] 0.097 0.097 0.28 Recurrent NN [5] 0.1006 0.0972 0.4361 GP [10] 0.125 ± 0.006 0.182 ± 0.037 0.370 ± 0.06…”
Section: Lorenz Chaotic Attractormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples of this might involve encoding the temporal property of the problem using a sliding window (shift register) of some predefined depth and resolution. Such an approach has seen wide spread application to predictive problems [9], [10] and [11]. In the second case, a recurrent learning model is employed.…”
Abstract. In this work, a recurrent linear GP model is designed by introducing the concept of internal state to the standard linear Genetic Programming (GP), so that it has the capacity of working on temporal sequence data. We benchmarked this model over four standard prediction and control problems, which include generic even parity problem, sun spot series prediction, Lorenz Chaotic time series prediction and pole balance control problem. From the experimental results, the recurrent linear GP model appears to be very competitive compared to those algorithms relying on spatial reasoning of the temporal problem.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.