2006
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20054464
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolving structures of star-forming clusters

Abstract: Context. Understanding the formation and evolution of young star clusters requires quantitative statistical measures of their structure. Aims. We investigate the structures of observed and modelled star-forming clusters. By considering the different evolutionary classes in the observations and the temporal evolution in models of gravoturbulent fragmentation, we study the temporal evolution of the cluster structures. Methods. We apply different statistical methods, in particular the normalised mean correlation … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
166
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(180 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
8
166
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results support the idea that stars in newly born clusters likely follow the fractal patterns of their parent molecular clouds, and that they eventually evolve towards more centrally concentrated structures (see Schmeja & Klessen 2006;Schmeja et al 2008Schmeja et al , 2009Sánchez et al 2007aSánchez et al , 2009). However, this seems to be only an overall trend.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Our results support the idea that stars in newly born clusters likely follow the fractal patterns of their parent molecular clouds, and that they eventually evolve towards more centrally concentrated structures (see Schmeja & Klessen 2006;Schmeja et al 2008Schmeja et al , 2009Sánchez et al 2007aSánchez et al , 2009). However, this seems to be only an overall trend.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…As a proxy for mass segregation we extend the method M Λ MST developed by Allison et al (2009b) (see also Cartwright & Whitworth 2004;Schmeja & Klessen 2006). In summary, the authors use the minimum spanning tree (MST), the graph which connects all vertices within a given sample with the lowest possible sum of edges and no closed loops (Gower & Ross 1969).…”
Section: Geometrical Minimum Spanning Tree γ Mstmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used the Cartwright & Whitworth (2004) definition of cluster radius, R c , as the distance between the mean position of all cluster members and the most distant sources. Following Schmeja & Klessen (2006) the area A of the cluster was estimated using the convex hull (the minimal convex set containing the set of points X in a real vector space V) of the data points. The convex hull radius, R h , is defined as the radius of a circle with an area equal to the area A of the convex hull of the data points.…”
Section: Grouping Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The convex hull radius, R h , is defined as the radius of a circle with an area equal to the area A of the convex hull of the data points. Schmeja & Klessen (2006) describe the elongation measure ξ as: ξ = R c /R h . Notes.…”
Section: Grouping Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%