2001
DOI: 10.1016/s1389-9341(01)00034-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolving forestry and rural development beliefs at midpoint and close of the 20th century

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
35
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Only some North American [4,15,25] and Scandinavian [23,29,32] studies have examined the management of small-sized properties (20−30 ha) with respect to the average surface areas in those regions, but which are nevertheless large in comparison with what is found on southern Europe. Due to a lack of information, and also in the face of the apparent complexity of the practices of owners of small private forests, management is often quickly qualified as opportunistic [8] and does not seem to satisfy any particular logic [18,20,24,28]. The most common silvicultural system in France is based on coppice associated to stand tree retained to produce timber wood.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only some North American [4,15,25] and Scandinavian [23,29,32] studies have examined the management of small-sized properties (20−30 ha) with respect to the average surface areas in those regions, but which are nevertheless large in comparison with what is found on southern Europe. Due to a lack of information, and also in the face of the apparent complexity of the practices of owners of small private forests, management is often quickly qualified as opportunistic [8] and does not seem to satisfy any particular logic [18,20,24,28]. The most common silvicultural system in France is based on coppice associated to stand tree retained to produce timber wood.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They follow such general targets that their interpretation and operationalization into the local ecological, social, and economic conditions remains in their hands, despite the high level of guidance and standardization (Kaufman 1960, Twight andLyden 1988). Particularly the ecological and biodiversity conservation targets are so complex that it is for the professionals to judge their practical implications (Eckerberg 1986, Farrell et al 2000, Kennedy et al 2001, Pregernig 2002, Larsen and Nielsen 2007.…”
Section: Implementation Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the forest sector organizations are facing multiple demands from a growing range of constituents (Kennedy et al 2001, Niskanen et al 2008, their investments in new competences and their practices can be expected to develop accordingly -that is, if they adapt. The organizations could, if they were forerunners, infl uence the entire organizational fi eld by generating expectations for progressive conservation behavior (Kagan et al 2003, Gunningham et al 2004).…”
Section: The Organizational Adaptation Mechanism and Its Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…La vente et la transformation des produits ligneux nes ont plusl as eule source de richesse économiqued ec ertaines zones rurales qui vivent aussi des services offerts par le secteur tertiaire en matière de tourisme, d'activités récréatives, de cadre de vie et d'aménités environnementales. De fait, selon Kennedy et al( 2001), le rôle des administrations forestières des payso ccidentaux n'est plusd em aximiser la production forestière mais de fournir aux communautés rurales les moyens de s'adapter àc es changements socioéconomiques en tirant profit des autres dimensions de la forêt (amélioration de la qualité et augmentation de la valeura joutée des produits bois, développement des activités récréatives, amélioration du cadre de vie…). Dans une telle perspective, la question du paysage n'est plusa ccessoire mais devient essentielle pourd en ombreux acteurs.…”
Section: Paysageetforêts àL'aube Du XXI E Siècle Enjeu De Forestiersunclassified