2009 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation 2009
DOI: 10.1109/cec.2009.4983289
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolving coordinated quadruped gaits with the HyperNEAT generative encoding

Abstract: Abstract-Legged robots show promise for complex mobility tasks, such as navigating rough terrain, but the design of their control software is both challenging and laborious. Traditional evolutionary algorithms can produce these controllers, but require manual decomposition or other problem simplification because conventionally-used direct encodings have trouble taking advantage of a problem's regularities and symmetries. Such active intervention is time consuming, limits the range of potential solutions, and r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
187
1
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 145 publications
(194 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(55 reference statements)
4
187
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the particular setup reported, the outputs of the HyperNEAT network are used as desired joint angles for the robot, and a P controller is used to approach these angles. In addition, a sine wave is provided as input to the network to ease the evolution of regular gaits (Clune et al, 2009a). While performance on the multilegged walking task was best with a hand designed input and output geometry, HyperNEAT still outperformed a direct encoding when the geometry was randomized (Clune et al, 2009b).…”
Section: Comparison To Other Methods For Evolving Large Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the particular setup reported, the outputs of the HyperNEAT network are used as desired joint angles for the robot, and a P controller is used to approach these angles. In addition, a sine wave is provided as input to the network to ease the evolution of regular gaits (Clune et al, 2009a). While performance on the multilegged walking task was best with a hand designed input and output geometry, HyperNEAT still outperformed a direct encoding when the geometry was randomized (Clune et al, 2009b).…”
Section: Comparison To Other Methods For Evolving Large Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has demonstrated an ability to address challenging problems in many task domains including: gaits (Clune et al, 2009), object manipulation (Bongard, 2008), biological study (Crespi et al, 2013;Doorly et al, 2009), and the optimization of morphology (Auerbach and Bongard, 2010;Bongard, 2010;Cheney et al, 2013). Often, these tasks have a single performance objective, or weighted sum, to assess the fitness of each individual.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A gait control table consist of rows of actuator commands with one column for each actuator, each row also has a condition for the transition to the next row.A second major avenue of research is that of neural networks (NN). In particular for locomotion of robot organisms HyperNEAT is used extensively with several studies showing that HyperNEAT is capable of creating efficient gaits for robots [4,9,20]. HyperNEAT is discussed in more detail in Section 3.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These times were chosen because they are multiples of the sine wave period and were found to produce better results and avoid organism flipping because of too harsh transitions between gaits. The fitness of each controller F i is calculated as in the original experiment [4] and is defined as…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation