2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmu.2016.11.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolving Cesarean Scar Pregnancy into Morbidity Adherent Placenta—Evidence from Serial Ultrasound Examination

Abstract: Objective:To present the complete history of a case with placenta accreta and demonstrate the special clues of ultrasonography finding during whole trimesters from early pregnancy to delivery.Case Report:A multiparous 28-year-old female with a history of multiple cesarean deliveries was found with suspected precesarean section scar pregnancy at 6 weeks of gestation. We performed a series of ultrasonography scans, which revealed placenta previa totalis and placenta accreta at 15 and 32 weeks of gestation, respe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The only possible justification of this may that in fresher scars the granulation tissue and scar itself may be a feasible or attractive site for MAP while the older scars may have changed physiologically so much that it would not favor the development of MAP and can be further examined. According to literature, the earliest gestation at which placenta accreta had been diagnosed by ultrasound was 9 weeks in a case of scar pregnancy [18][19][20] . Vijayasree M 2018 21 in the study, revealed sonography was only 33-percent sensitive for detecting placenta accrete.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The only possible justification of this may that in fresher scars the granulation tissue and scar itself may be a feasible or attractive site for MAP while the older scars may have changed physiologically so much that it would not favor the development of MAP and can be further examined. According to literature, the earliest gestation at which placenta accreta had been diagnosed by ultrasound was 9 weeks in a case of scar pregnancy [18][19][20] . Vijayasree M 2018 21 in the study, revealed sonography was only 33-percent sensitive for detecting placenta accrete.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No clear treatment guidelines have been suggested for the treatment of Morbidly Adherent Placenta. It has been shown that if cesarean scar pregnancy is complicated with morbidly adherent placenta (cesarean scar adherent placental tissue invasion), the most frequently therapeutic approach is hysterectomy [9].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main ultrasound signs highlighted, which are currently used by most authors in their specialty studies, are: the loss/ the interruption of the hypoechoic area at the level of the myometrium under the placental bed, placental gaps (large, irregular, transonic spaces that can present turbulent blood flow), the interruption of the hyperechoic line represented by the posterior vesical wall and the uterine serous membrane at this level, the thinning of the myometrium (reaching < 1mm), the presence of a exophytic area which exceeds the uterine serous membrane, infiltrating the urinary bladder. The echo Doppler images reveal: blood flow at the level of the placental gaps, most often exhibiting a turbulent character, the intense vascularization in the subplacental area and the hyper-vascularization of the vesicouterine interface (3,(5)(6)(7).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%