2022
DOI: 10.1108/jpbm-06-2021-3528
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolving brand boundaries and expectations: looking back on brand equity, brand loyalty, and brand image research to move forward

Abstract: Purpose This paper aims to critically review the most cited literature published from 2000 to 2020 in 24 top-ranked marketing journals on the three most studied branding concepts of the 21st century – brand equity, brand loyalty and brand image – to explore how in these papers they have been defined, measured and examined, and propose how they should move forward in an era where brands are expected to be “socially and socio-politically conscious.” Design/methodology/approach For each concept a systematic lit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
42
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 223 publications
0
42
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Strong brand image is regarded as the most powerful tool to build competitive advantage. Parris and Guzman (2023) also confirmed the significance of the phenomenon of brand image by stating that further research is warranted regarding this construct as no consensus is developed in past research about the independence and interdependence of this construct.…”
Section: What Is Brand Image (Bi)?mentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Strong brand image is regarded as the most powerful tool to build competitive advantage. Parris and Guzman (2023) also confirmed the significance of the phenomenon of brand image by stating that further research is warranted regarding this construct as no consensus is developed in past research about the independence and interdependence of this construct.…”
Section: What Is Brand Image (Bi)?mentioning
confidence: 83%
“…There is no consensus on the definition of brand image among researchers, yet the researchers widely agree that brand image is a dynamic, subjective concept heavily based on an individual’s cognitive aspects (Lee et al , 2014; Parris and Guzmán, 2022). Many brand researchers also agree that perceptions and associations (Aaker, 1996; Anselmsson et al , 2007; French and Smith, 2013; Keller, 1993), whether they are based on a real or mental encounter with the brand (Veloutsou and Delgado-Ballester, 2018), are the base of brand image.…”
Section: A Conceptual Framework For the Emergence Of A Values-based P...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The frequently cited definition of brand image is credited to Keller (1993). However, recent researchers (Veloutsou and Delgado-Ballester, 2018; Fetscherin et al , 2021; Parris and Guzmán, 2022) have challenged this traditional approach of conceptualisation, arguing that what was defined as brand image refers to brand reputation, and brand image is a determinant of brand reputation (Fetscherin et al , 2021). Although a brand image is the individual-specific view of the brand, brand reputation is the summation of individual judgements (Parris and Guzmán, 2022).…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, recent researchers (Veloutsou and Delgado-Ballester, 2018; Fetscherin et al , 2021; Parris and Guzmán, 2022) have challenged this traditional approach of conceptualisation, arguing that what was defined as brand image refers to brand reputation, and brand image is a determinant of brand reputation (Fetscherin et al , 2021). Although a brand image is the individual-specific view of the brand, brand reputation is the summation of individual judgements (Parris and Guzmán, 2022). To acknowledge this academic discussion, this study defines brand image as an individual’s perception of a brand after one real or mental encounter with that brand (Veloutsou and Delgado-Ballester, 2018).…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation