2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2011.01636.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolutionary trends on extant cat skull morphology (Carnivora: Felidae): a three-dimensional geometrical approach

Abstract: The skulls of 33 extant cat species were characterized through three-dimensional geometric morphometrics using 20 landmarks. A principal component analysis (PCA) was performed with Procrustes fitted coordinates, and the PC-scores were phylogenetically corrected by independent contrasts method. Three PCs allowed for the definition of five cat skull patterns. PC1: 'snouted/massive-headed cats' (genus Panthera) opposing the 'round-headed small cats' (genus Oncifelis, Prionailurus rubiginosus, Prionailurus bengale… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
31
0
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(66 reference statements)
3
31
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…3D analyses might confirm the pattern we found in 2D ventral views, as suggested by Sicuro (2011) noticing that several species of small cats are round-headed, while an elongated snout is the most typical aspect of the large species of the genus Panthera. His work, as the previous two-dimensional analysis by Slater & Van Valkenburgh (2008), did not test differences between subfamilies.…”
Section: Sensitivity Analyses and A Few Considerations On The Other supporting
confidence: 87%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…3D analyses might confirm the pattern we found in 2D ventral views, as suggested by Sicuro (2011) noticing that several species of small cats are round-headed, while an elongated snout is the most typical aspect of the large species of the genus Panthera. His work, as the previous two-dimensional analysis by Slater & Van Valkenburgh (2008), did not test differences between subfamilies.…”
Section: Sensitivity Analyses and A Few Considerations On The Other supporting
confidence: 87%
“…However, whether the same patterns will be found on the dorsal side and, even more accurately, using 3D landmarks and semilandmarks over the entire cranium, is something that will have to be assessed in future studies but seems likely based on previous work, at least for facial elongation (Slater & Van Valkenburgh 2008;Sicuro 2011). …”
Section: Preliminary Considerations On Accuracymentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…low morphological diversity) (Ewer, 1973); this fact could be related to their restricted hypercarnivorous diet that could have acted as an evolutionary constraint (Holliday & Steppan, 2004). Even though the Felidae are considered to be homogeneous in skull morphology (Goswami, 2006;Sunquist & Sunquist, 2009;Sicuro, 2011), the Puma lineage shows noteworthy differences (Segura, Prevosti & Cassini, 2013); thus, the conservative shape of skull is directly related to the taxonomic level used in the work.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%