2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2004.00858.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolutionary traction: the cost of adaptation and the evolution of sex

Abstract: The advantage of sexual reproduction remains a puzzle for evolutionary biologists. Everything else being equal, asexual populations are expected to have twice the number of offspring produced by similar sexual populations. Yet, asexual species are uncommon among higher eukaryotes. In models assuming small populations, high mutation rates, or frequent environmental changes, sexual reproduction seems to have at least a two‐fold advantage over asexuality. But the advantage of sex for large populations, low mutati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The increase in modifier fixation with higher s a is likely to arise because strongly favored mutants are likely to carry along with them many deleterious mutations in the absence of recombination (Peck 1994;Hadany and Feldman 2005) and recombination can free these advantageous mutations from their deleterious backgrounds. In line with this reasoning, Table 1 shows that for N ¼ 1000 and U ¼ 0.5, re- combination aids the fixation of advantageous mutants and decreases the fixation rate of deleterious mutants in all cases simulated.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The increase in modifier fixation with higher s a is likely to arise because strongly favored mutants are likely to carry along with them many deleterious mutations in the absence of recombination (Peck 1994;Hadany and Feldman 2005) and recombination can free these advantageous mutations from their deleterious backgrounds. In line with this reasoning, Table 1 shows that for N ¼ 1000 and U ¼ 0.5, re- combination aids the fixation of advantageous mutants and decreases the fixation rate of deleterious mutants in all cases simulated.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, if background deleterious mutations are frequent, recombination has an extra advantage in aiding purifying selection and is even more likely to evolve than in the presence of beneficial mutations alone. Such a scenario was discussed by Hadany and Feldman (2005) and could explain why recombination is more likely to occur in new, stressed environments (Abdullah and Borts 2001;Grishkan et al 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This "Hill−Robertson" or "linkage" interference can be alleviated by recombination, allowing adaptive mutations to combine onto the same background or escape deleterious neighbors (31)(32)(33)(34)(35). In addition to affecting the rate of fixation of beneficial mutations, a deleterious mutation genetically linked to a beneficial mutation can "hitchhike" to high frequency or even fixation (36,37). These theoretical predictions are beginning to be borne out in empirical data (38)(39)(40)(41)(42)(43)(44)(45)(46)(47).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of studies on the evolution of sex focus either on the evolution of recombination rates (see reviews by Feldman et al 1996;Barton and Charlesworth 1998;Otto and Lenormand 2002) or on the long-term consequences of sex to the mean fitness and competitive ability of a population (e.g., Muller 1964;Kimura and Maruyama 1966;Kondrashov 1988;Howard and Lively 1994;Peck et al 1997;Chasnov 2000;Agrawal and Chasnov 2001;Hadany and Feldman 2005). Fully understanding the evolution and maintenance of sex, however, requires that we consider populations capable of both sexual and asexual reproduction and investigate when increased investment in sexual reproduction can evolve.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%