2004
DOI: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2004.tb00484.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolutionary Rates in the Adaptive Radiation of Beetles on Plants

Abstract: Herbivorous insects and other small consumers are often specialized both in use of particular host taxa and in use of particular host tissues. Such consumers also often seem to show consistent differences in the rates of evolution of these two dimensions of host use, implying common processes, but this has been little studied. Here we quantify these rates of change in host use evolution in a major radiation of herbivorous insects, the Chrysomeloidea, whose diversity has been attributed to their use of flowerin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

17
128
2
4

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(151 citation statements)
references
References 121 publications
17
128
2
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Most insect phytophagy is highly host-specific (Bernays and Chapman 1994, Termonia et al 2001, Farrell andSequeira 2004). Therefore, one might expect more types of damage, particularly mines and specialized damage, on a more diverse bulk flora (Price 1991(Price , 2002, in accord with the general observation that insect richness correlates with plant species richness (e.g., Siemann et al 1996, Wright and Samways 1998, Knops et al 1999, Hawkins and Porter 2003.…”
Section: Floral Diversity and Insect Damagementioning
confidence: 94%
“…Most insect phytophagy is highly host-specific (Bernays and Chapman 1994, Termonia et al 2001, Farrell andSequeira 2004). Therefore, one might expect more types of damage, particularly mines and specialized damage, on a more diverse bulk flora (Price 1991(Price , 2002, in accord with the general observation that insect richness correlates with plant species richness (e.g., Siemann et al 1996, Wright and Samways 1998, Knops et al 1999, Hawkins and Porter 2003.…”
Section: Floral Diversity and Insect Damagementioning
confidence: 94%
“…They all lack some important higher taxa and/or the relationships within Cerambycidae s.l. lack consistent resolution and strong statistical support (see Haddad & McKenna, 2016 for review) whether the studies focused on Phytophaga (Farrell, 1998;Marvaldi et al, 2009), Chrysomeloidea (Reid, 1995;Farrell, 1998;Farrell & Sequeira, 2004;Gómez-Zurita et al, 2007Wang et al, 2013), Coleoptera Lawrence et al, 2011;Bocak et al, 2014;McKenna et al, 2015) or even Cerambycidae s.s. (Raje et al, 2016). Consequently, many aspects of chrysomeloid classification and evolution, particularly those concerning Cerambycidae s.l., remain the subject of consider- Svacha & Lawrence, 2014); early host plant associations (gymnosperms versus angiosperms); etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it has become apparent that the diversity of phytophagous insects is not explained solely by specialization onto particular plant lineages, as tissue specialization (Strong et al 1984;Farrell 1998;Marvaldi et al 2002) and phenological partitioning (Feder 1998;Feder and Filchak 1999) have been shown to permit greater coexistence and/or facilitate speciation. Indeed, the plant substrate attacked has been shown to be more highly correlated with beetle phylogeny than host-taxon use (Marvaldi et al 2002;Farrell and Sequeira 2004). In addition, plant substrate may have a substantial influence on the evolution of specialization and host use overlap because of a greater population regulation by natural enemies for external feeders (and therefore lower levels of competition) and greater levels of competition for internal feeders (see review in Peterson and Denno 1998).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%