IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation 2010
DOI: 10.1109/cec.2010.5586131
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolutionary process indicators for active IGAs applied to weight tuning in unit selection TTS synthesis

Abstract: Text-to-Speech (TTS) synthesis systems produce speech from an input text. Corpus based or unit selection TTS (US-TTS) are based on retrieving the best set of speech units from a large labelled speech database. To that effect, the unit selection is guided by dynamic programming and a weighted cost function. Several weight tuning approaches have been defined so as to integrate human preferences inthe unit selection process, but with no great success beyond expert-based hand tuning. However, active interactive ge… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 28 publications
(33 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This might occur either because a good solution has been found before finishing the tournaments or because the user has become fatigued, being unable to realize the minor variations the last iteration of the evolutionary process typically attain. The stop criterion of the iterative process is determined by considering the evolution of the number of draws with respect to the total number of comparisons of the directed graph (i.e., the certainty ratio) [39]). The last iteration the certainty ratio increases (before decreasing until the end of the iterative process) is considered as the point where the user has converged (see Fig.…”
Section: Weight Patternsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This might occur either because a good solution has been found before finishing the tournaments or because the user has become fatigued, being unable to realize the minor variations the last iteration of the evolutionary process typically attain. The stop criterion of the iterative process is determined by considering the evolution of the number of draws with respect to the total number of comparisons of the directed graph (i.e., the certainty ratio) [39]). The last iteration the certainty ratio increases (before decreasing until the end of the iterative process) is considered as the point where the user has converged (see Fig.…”
Section: Weight Patternsmentioning
confidence: 99%