2011
DOI: 10.1038/ng.1034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolutionary paths to antibiotic resistance under dynamically sustained drug selection

Abstract: Antibiotic resistance can evolve through sequential accumulation of multiple mutations1. To study such gradual evolution, we developed a selection device, the morbidostat, which continuously monitors bacterial growth and dynamically regulates drug concentrations such that the evolving population is constantly challenged. We analyzed evolutionary trajectories of Escherichia coli populations towards resistance to chloramphenicol, doxycycline, and trimethoprim. Over a period of ~20 days, resistance levels increas… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

42
785
1
7

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 670 publications
(837 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
42
785
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…A comparison with the literature lead us to believe that this result is probably not peculiar to our specific conditions, but rather it could be fairly general. While our system, in fact, exhibited substantial flexibility in evolutionary trajectories, this flexibility is similar to what is typically observed in many bacterial evolution experiments [51]: hard adaptive constraints are rarely observed at the nucleotide level [52], and even in the examples that reported the highest degree of molecular convergence, adaptation involved more than one loci and featured a considerable amount of intralocus diversity [53][54][55]. Therefore, given that mutational target sizes seem not strictly limited, we expect spectrum effects on evolvability to be modest at best in most cases.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…A comparison with the literature lead us to believe that this result is probably not peculiar to our specific conditions, but rather it could be fairly general. While our system, in fact, exhibited substantial flexibility in evolutionary trajectories, this flexibility is similar to what is typically observed in many bacterial evolution experiments [51]: hard adaptive constraints are rarely observed at the nucleotide level [52], and even in the examples that reported the highest degree of molecular convergence, adaptation involved more than one loci and featured a considerable amount of intralocus diversity [53][54][55]. Therefore, given that mutational target sizes seem not strictly limited, we expect spectrum effects on evolvability to be modest at best in most cases.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…fitness landscapes | DHFR | drug resistance | protein stability | molten globule P redictive models of antibiotic resistance are key to developing novel antibacterial treatments (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6). Besides its practical importance, antibiotic escape presents a tractable general model of adaptive evolutionary dynamics that can provide insights into fundamental questions in evolution, such as the reproducibility and predictability of evolutionary trajectories (4,7,8) as well as the importance of epistasis and pleiotropy (5,7,9,10).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, mutations conferring resistance against trimethoprim (TMP) were largely limited to the target gene, namely the ORF and upstream region of folA, the gene encoding dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) (1,5,11). DHFR is an essential core metabolic enzyme that converts dihydrofolate to tetrahydrofolate-a main source of carbon atoms in several key pathways.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To explore this hypothesis, we evolved the same ancestral strain toward tolerance to heat, but in increments of 1°C every 50 generations (from 30°C up to 39°C). This evolutionary design resembles the "morbidostat" that was recently applied to evolution of drug resistance in bacteria (26). Curiously, under this regime an extra copy of chromosome III was not gained after 450 generations in any of the four repetitions (termed Gradual 1-4) of the experiment (Fig.…”
Section: Elimination Of the Extra Copy Of Chromosome III At Permissivementioning
confidence: 99%