Ecological Genetics and Evolution 1971
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4757-0432-7_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolutionary Oscillations in Drosophila pseudoobscura

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
26
1
1

Year Published

1976
1976
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
26
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This situation is consistent with the stable inversion polymorphisms observed, for example, in natural populations of D. persimilis (Coyne et al 1992) and laboratory populations of D. pseudoobscura (Dobzhansky 1954;Wallace 1968;Ohta 1971). If the fitnesses of alleles involved in local adaptation vary with environmental conditions, as suggested by laboratory experiments on flies (Dobzhansky 1954), then the inversion frequencies could cycle seasonally, as is seen in D. pseudoobscura (Epling et al 1953;Dobzhansky 1971). If the alleles favored in one population (or species) are incompatible with those favored in the other, inversions will show underdominance, as seen in many interspecific crosses (White 1978;King 1993).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…This situation is consistent with the stable inversion polymorphisms observed, for example, in natural populations of D. persimilis (Coyne et al 1992) and laboratory populations of D. pseudoobscura (Dobzhansky 1954;Wallace 1968;Ohta 1971). If the fitnesses of alleles involved in local adaptation vary with environmental conditions, as suggested by laboratory experiments on flies (Dobzhansky 1954), then the inversion frequencies could cycle seasonally, as is seen in D. pseudoobscura (Epling et al 1953;Dobzhansky 1971). If the alleles favored in one population (or species) are incompatible with those favored in the other, inversions will show underdominance, as seen in many interspecific crosses (White 1978;King 1993).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…While there is still an active debate over the relatively recent data on enzyme polymorphisms (see the reviews by Wright, 1978;and Harris, 1980), the maintenance of chromosomal polymorphisms has from the earliest days (Wright and Dobzhansky, 1946) been less controversial. The case for selection acting on chromosomal inversions has been consistently more convincing (da Cunha, 1955;Lewontin and White, 1960;Dobzhansky, 1971;Lewontin, 1974;Anderson et a!., 1975). Here we report data on an enzyme polymorphism that is known to be very tightly associated with a chromosomal inversion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Most inversions have many and varied phenotypic effects, and are subject to selection in many ways (Dobzhansky, 1970(Dobzhansky, , 1971. It is essential to study the contributions of genic and karyotypic effects to selection on a wider range of characters and in a wider range of species before making generalisations about the way in which inversion polymorphisms are maintained.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chromosomal inversion polymorphisms are often subject to strong selection pressures despite the fact that the only direct effects of the inversion are a change in gene order, and suppression of recombination in heterozygotes (Dobzhansky, 1971).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%