2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-40352-6_41
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolutionary Multiobjective Optimization for Digital Predistortion Architectures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A preliminary version of this paper has been presented in [12]. This paper goes beyond the previous optimization framework presented in [12] by employing fidelity-based validation of our employed power estimation approach, and applying an improved system accuracy measurement for DPD design space exploration.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A preliminary version of this paper has been presented in [12]. This paper goes beyond the previous optimization framework presented in [12] by employing fidelity-based validation of our employed power estimation approach, and applying an improved system accuracy measurement for DPD design space exploration.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper goes beyond the previous optimization framework presented in [12] by employing fidelity-based validation of our employed power estimation approach, and applying an improved system accuracy measurement for DPD design space exploration. More specifically, in Section 4, computation of estimation fidelity is integrated to verify the accuracy of the proposed power estimator, and the EVM measurement is modified to better represent the accuracy of the system.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the identification of such an optimum might involve inefficient trial-and-error approaches or the non-trivial formulation of a high-dimensionality optimization problem. As a consequence, an active area of research concerns approaches based on numerical optimization or machine learning for optimal signal-input synthesis and operating point selection of digitally controlled PAs [9][10][11][12][13], and DIDPAs in particular [14,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typically, the search for the best features (or regressors) to be added to a model of a given complexity is a combinatorial task, performed by exhaustive search [24], becoming a nondeterministic polynomial time (NP-hard) problem [25]. Indeed, although heuristic methods, such as hill-climbing [26], particle swarm optimization (PSO) [27], [28] and evolutionary algorithms [29] have been proposed, they still suffer from scalability [24], [30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%