2005
DOI: 10.1080/03052150512331303436
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolutionary multi-objective optimization in water distribution network design

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
73
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 182 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
73
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A multi-objective optimisation approach was possibly first applied in the late 1990s (Figure 1), maximising the network benefit on one hand and minimising the system cost (of network rehabilitation) on the other hand [63]. In studies of newly designed WDSs, in addition to the economic measure, the other objectives considered were the pressure deficit [30,62,[64][65][66][67] or excess [68,69] at network nodes, the penalty cost for violating the pressure constraint [70], greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions [71][72][73][74][75][76] or emission cost [77], water discolouration risk [68] and water quality [78]. A multiobjective optimisation approach is considered "very appealing for engineers as it provides a tool to investigate interesting trade-offs", for example, a marginal pressure deficit can be outweighed by a considerable cost reduction [67].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A multi-objective optimisation approach was possibly first applied in the late 1990s (Figure 1), maximising the network benefit on one hand and minimising the system cost (of network rehabilitation) on the other hand [63]. In studies of newly designed WDSs, in addition to the economic measure, the other objectives considered were the pressure deficit [30,62,[64][65][66][67] or excess [68,69] at network nodes, the penalty cost for violating the pressure constraint [70], greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions [71][72][73][74][75][76] or emission cost [77], water discolouration risk [68] and water quality [78]. A multiobjective optimisation approach is considered "very appealing for engineers as it provides a tool to investigate interesting trade-offs", for example, a marginal pressure deficit can be outweighed by a considerable cost reduction [67].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The approach of using stochastic optimization algorithms has been investigated in WSNs design and location of control valves (Ramos et al 2010;Araújo et al 2006;Farmani et al 2005;Cunha and Sousa 2001). Nevertheless, the use of these techniques for the current problem has not yet been thoroughly studied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Por esta razón, los enfoques heurísticos son adecuados para resolver este tipo de problemas (Baños et al 2010). Estas herramientas se basan por lo general en los algoritmos genéticos multiobjetivo (Savic 2002;Farmani et al 2005), que implican más de una función objetivo a optimizar simultáneamente obteniendo la mejor combinación de los valores de las variables de decisión.…”
Section: -Introducciónunclassified