2011
DOI: 10.1007/s10462-011-9212-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolutionary multi objective optimization for rule mining: a review

Abstract: Evolutionary multi objective optimization (EMOO) systems are evolutionary systems which are used for optimizing various measures of the evolving system. Rule mining has gained attention in the knowledge discovery literature. The problem of discovering rules with specific properties is treated as a multi objective optimization problem. The objectives to be optimized being the metrics like accuracy, comprehensibility, surprisingness, novelty to name a few. There are a variety of EMOO algorithms in the literature… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The three objectives identified in the previous section highlight the need of methods able to deal with several objectives. Multi-objective optimization can handle such problems; Srinivasan and Ramkrishnan made a review of rule mining approaches using multi-objective optimization [13].…”
Section: A Multi-objective Model To Discover Partial Classification Rmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The three objectives identified in the previous section highlight the need of methods able to deal with several objectives. Multi-objective optimization can handle such problems; Srinivasan and Ramkrishnan made a review of rule mining approaches using multi-objective optimization [13].…”
Section: A Multi-objective Model To Discover Partial Classification Rmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A neighborhood of a rule can be, for example, all rules having one more or one less term. Most of multi-objective rule mining contributions presented in the review of Srinivasan and Ramkrishnan are based on the metaheuristic NSGA-II (genetic algorithm dedicated to multi-objective problems) [13]. DMLS has previously proven to give at least as good results as NSGA-II on several problems [16].…”
Section: Dmls Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some systems allow the user to specify the metrics for optimization and/or the threshold values for rule selection while a very few systems allow the user to interact with the system during execution [8]. Iglesia et al [6] [9], propose the use of multi-objective optimization evolutionary algorithms, to allow the user to interactively select a number of interest measures and deliver the best nuggets.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ishibuchi [18] proposes an EMOA to the design of accurate and interpretable fuzzy rule-based systems and have applied multi-objective genetic fuzzy rule selection. A detailed discussion of evolutionary algorithms for Multi-Objective optimization of classification rules is found in [19] .…”
Section: Emoo Systems For Rule Miningmentioning
confidence: 99%