2016
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.2453
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolutionary morphology of the rabbit skull

Abstract: The skull of leporids (rabbits and hares) is highly transformed, typified by pronounced arching of the dorsal skull and ventral flexion of the facial region (i.e., facial tilt). Previous studies show that locomotor behavior influences aspects of cranial shape in leporids, and here we use an extensive 3D geometric morphometrics dataset to further explore what influences leporid cranial diversity. Facial tilt angle, a trait that strongly correlates with locomotor mode, significantly predicts the cranial shape va… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
(76 reference statements)
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Considerable homoplasy in the morphology of leporid species was identified by Corbet (1983) after examining 21 morphological characteristics for 22 leporid species. More recent morphometric studies of lagomorphs have also found a high degree of homoplasy, low phylogenetic signal, and adaptive divergence in skull shape (Ge et al, 2015;Kraatz and Sherratt, 2016;Feijó et al, 2020). These studies highlight the difficulties in reconstructing a robust phylogeny for lagomorphs, particularly at the intergeneric level, by using morphological data.…”
Section: Phylogenetic Relationships Within Lagomorphamentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Considerable homoplasy in the morphology of leporid species was identified by Corbet (1983) after examining 21 morphological characteristics for 22 leporid species. More recent morphometric studies of lagomorphs have also found a high degree of homoplasy, low phylogenetic signal, and adaptive divergence in skull shape (Ge et al, 2015;Kraatz and Sherratt, 2016;Feijó et al, 2020). These studies highlight the difficulties in reconstructing a robust phylogeny for lagomorphs, particularly at the intergeneric level, by using morphological data.…”
Section: Phylogenetic Relationships Within Lagomorphamentioning
confidence: 82%
“…For example, the previously mentioned Anoles represent a natural case study by which RUNX2 repeat evolution may influence adaptive convergence of cranial ecomorphs 107 and studies in birds will elucidate whether RUNX2 QA repeat variation promotes adaptive changes in beak shape diversity 107 . In addition, leporid rabbits and hares (order Lagomorpha) are a relatively recent (~20 mya) evolutionary radiation that display substantial craniofacial length and angle variation in response to different ecologies 116 , 117 . However, how RUNX2 QA repeat variation corresponds with the natural craniofacial variation in this group remains unknown.…”
Section: Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In geckos, cranial kinesis, which is supported by the cranial sutures, offers the capability for a larger bite force ( Herrel et al, 2000 ). It is possible this functional role of sutures observed in cranial kinesis of geckos is mimicked in mammals which also exhibit cranial kinesis, such as rabbits ( Kraatz and Sherratt, 2016 ). Not only are sutures functionally important during feeding, but they also act as shock absorbers to absorb strains from other external inputs, such as fighting behaviours and locomotion ( Curtis et al, 2013 ).…”
Section: The Importance Of Suturesmentioning
confidence: 99%