“…Last, but more importantly, Cregan's claim that the ‘utilitarian case’ presented by the pro‐therapeutic cloning ethicists ‘is not a strong ethical argument in itself’ 1 reveals her inability to realize that authentically moral policies are utilitarian virtually by definition. Indeed, morality arose as a socially advantageous biological product of evolution 4,5 and continued to be socially utilitarian for millions of years because it was essentially aimed at ensuring the survival of the small groups that characterized humankind for the 99% of its evolution 6,7 . Founded as they were in its remaining 1%, all religions and philosophies are pathetic in their attempts to impose invented ‘moral’ principles which, besides being often mutually incompatible, frequently emerge to be patently at odds with the biological moral imperatives that enabled our species to survive for millions of years 6,7 .…”