Epistemological Dimensions of Evolutionary Psychology 2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-1387-9_7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolutionary Media Psychology and Its Epistemological Foundation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is in fact a growing body of theoretical and empirical research that adopts this ultimate perspective and tries to reconcile it with the aforementioned proximate explanations on digital games (e.g., Mendenhall et al, 2010a , b ; Bertozzi, 2014 ; Kasumovic et al, 2015 ; Devilly et al, 2017 ; Breuer, 2018a ; Brill et al, 2018 ; Lange and Schwab, 2018 ; Lange et al, 2018 ; Liebold et al, 2018 ; Lynch, 2018 ; Melzer, 2018 ), other media or the media in general (e.g., Ratnasingam and Ellis, 2011 ; Hennighausen and Schwab, 2015 ; Brill and Schwab, 2020 ), as well as on human culture in general (e.g., Lange et al, 2013 ). From this perspective, the underlying reasons for gender differences in media use, selection (based on preferences), and effects can, to some degree, be attributed to mate choice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is in fact a growing body of theoretical and empirical research that adopts this ultimate perspective and tries to reconcile it with the aforementioned proximate explanations on digital games (e.g., Mendenhall et al, 2010a , b ; Bertozzi, 2014 ; Kasumovic et al, 2015 ; Devilly et al, 2017 ; Breuer, 2018a ; Brill et al, 2018 ; Lange and Schwab, 2018 ; Lange et al, 2018 ; Liebold et al, 2018 ; Lynch, 2018 ; Melzer, 2018 ), other media or the media in general (e.g., Ratnasingam and Ellis, 2011 ; Hennighausen and Schwab, 2015 ; Brill and Schwab, 2020 ), as well as on human culture in general (e.g., Lange et al, 2013 ). From this perspective, the underlying reasons for gender differences in media use, selection (based on preferences), and effects can, to some degree, be attributed to mate choice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, from parental investment theory (Trivers, 1972), it can be predicted that “women prefer media contents dealing with issues of mate choice, partner loyalty, and the loss of a partner … [and] men are more likely to select media contents dealing with kin protection, rivalry, status, power, and the acquisition and maintenance of resources” (Hennighausen and Schwab, 2015, p. 144). In a sample of movie visitors, Schwab (2010) replicated the finding that women prefer melodramatic and romantic movies, whereas men prefer action movies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditionally, communication scientists have used a sociocultural perspective to explain the proximate psychological antecedents and consequences of media selection and influence, but have neglected the adaptive function by not investigating communication phenomena from an evolutionary perspective (Hennighausen & Schwab, 2015; Ng, 2016; Piazza & Ingram, 2009, 2015; Sherry, 2004). Following the recommendation of Sherry (2004) to consider media use and effect as the outcome of both nature and nurture, the present study is among the first to empirically examine why sensational news was selected over evolutionary time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%