2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.08.066
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolutionary, historical and political economic perspectives on health and disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
108
0
13

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 167 publications
(123 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
2
108
0
13
Order By: Relevance
“…Until such fundamental changes to the ecologies of poor nations, people in them would die of infectious diseases and "escape" the scourges of noninfectious ones. This model has, of course, been critiqued, largely on the basis of the now wellknown dual burden of infectious and noninfectious diseases that plague people in poor countries (Armelagos et al 2005;Barrett et al 1998). One of the important lessons that becomes clear in Wutich and Brewis's excellent paper is that poor or nonexistent water systems can be empirically connected not only to multiple infectious diseases, as is well known, but also to psychological stress, one particularly burdensome noninfectious global health problem.…”
Section: Conclusion: Toward a Broader Anthropology Of Resource Insecumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Until such fundamental changes to the ecologies of poor nations, people in them would die of infectious diseases and "escape" the scourges of noninfectious ones. This model has, of course, been critiqued, largely on the basis of the now wellknown dual burden of infectious and noninfectious diseases that plague people in poor countries (Armelagos et al 2005;Barrett et al 1998). One of the important lessons that becomes clear in Wutich and Brewis's excellent paper is that poor or nonexistent water systems can be empirically connected not only to multiple infectious diseases, as is well known, but also to psychological stress, one particularly burdensome noninfectious global health problem.…”
Section: Conclusion: Toward a Broader Anthropology Of Resource Insecumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may be McMICHAEL 80 argues that the historical transitions experienced by our prehistoric ancestors when they climbed down out of the trees onto the savannahs, incorporated meat into their diet, and more recently since the emergence of Homo sapiens, the development of agriculture, and the conquest of new territories and civilizations favored the emergence of (and exposure to) infectious agents of animal origin. ARMELAGOS et al 7 analyzed the epidemiological transitions experienced by humankind and concluded that we are undergoing a new transition, in which parasitic infections that were common 10,000 years ago, at the time of the first transition (with the development of techniques for cultivation of plants and domestication of animals), are now reemerging with the possibility of causing major economic impacts. The agricultural frontier's encroachment on natural areas and parasites' resistance to conventional treatments can explain this reemergence.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The increase in food production obtained through agriculture favored the agglomeration of individuals and consequently the occurrence of specific human parasites, transmitted by direct contact with environments and/or contaminated foods. In addition, the agricultural surplus was stored in deposits, increasing the potential risk of infection by contamination of the grain or other foodstuffs and by attracting animals like rodents 7,31,87 , the natural hosts of various zoonoses affecting humans 92 .…”
Section: Principal Zoonoses Of the Old World (Except East And Southeamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As regards epidemics, it has been claimed that the low population density in the European Neanderthal society makes epidemic spread of diseases unlikely (Armelagos et al, 2003). However, the large mobility implied by migration and by huge hunting territories, as well as the need for members of each group (typically with about 10 adults) to visit other groups in an extended mating network (needed for reasons of countering fluctuations in availability of females and incidentally for reducing inbreeding problems) may weaken this argument.…”
Section: Other Contributions To Neanderthal Death Ratementioning
confidence: 99%