2012
DOI: 10.1080/13504509.2012.658098
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolutionary governance choice for corporate social responsibility: a forestry campaign case in South Korea

Abstract: Firms select different governance types (e.g. internalisation, outsourcing or collaboration) for corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities. This paper examined how the choice of CSR governance type is influenced by social factors and organisational experiences and how changes in these factors affect the governance choice. These questions are especially meaningful in the context of developing countries with weak institutional environments and recent social change. With the unique phenomenon that is not r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
1
19
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, a private enterprise, Yuhan-Kimberly, participated in reforestation projects in North Korea. Yuhan-Kimberly has led the forestry campaign called "Keep Green Korea" since 1984 [43]. It conducted the campaign through various governance types, such as donations, collaborations, and in-house projects.…”
Section: Actorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, a private enterprise, Yuhan-Kimberly, participated in reforestation projects in North Korea. Yuhan-Kimberly has led the forestry campaign called "Keep Green Korea" since 1984 [43]. It conducted the campaign through various governance types, such as donations, collaborations, and in-house projects.…”
Section: Actorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, the ability of the locals to govern the common pool resources by themselves is determined by the degree of dependence on the resource. For example, Wossen et al (2013), Boström (2012), Chung et al (2012), Wade (1988) and Dietz et al (2003) argue that the resource must be important for the users so that they would be willing to participate and cooperate in collective action for management and use of the resource. Further, Tatlonghari and Sumalde (2008) point out that the commons users are less likely to cooperate when the dependence on the benefits of a particular coordinating arrangement is loosened.…”
Section: Modelling the Determinates Of Forest Dependencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Por fim, tem-se que a relação estratégica entre as atividades principais de uma empresa e suas ações de RSC é um fator determinante de um tipo de governança (CHUNG; YEO-CHANG; CHO, 2012;HUSTED, 2003). Neste sentido, quanto mais forte o vínculo, maior a probabilidade de a empresa internalizar as atividades relacionadas à RSC em termos de custoefetividade.…”
Section: Item Da Internalizaçãounclassified
“…Neste sentido, quanto mais forte o vínculo, maior a probabilidade de a empresa internalizar as atividades relacionadas à RSC em termos de custoefetividade. Já a falta de infraestrutura social e experiência interna sugere a escolha de governança do tipo mais passivo, isto é, terceirização, pois a doação não requer conhecimento sobre as atividades e pode ser realizada simplesmente doando dinheiro a um terceiro (CHUNG; YEO-CHANG; CHO, 2012;HUSTED, 2003).…”
Section: Item Da Internalizaçãounclassified