2022
DOI: 10.3390/genes13020183
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolutionary Genetic Signatures of Selection on Bone-Related Variation within Human and Chimpanzee Populations

Abstract: Bone strength and the incidence and severity of skeletal disorders vary significantly among human populations, due in part to underlying genetic differentiation. While clinical models predict that this variation is largely deleterious, natural population variation unrelated to disease can go unnoticed, altering our perception of how natural selection has shaped bone morphologies over deep and recent time periods. Here, we conduct the first comparative population-based genetic analysis of the main bone structur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 114 publications
(174 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We find that several loci associated with adaptive morphological changes are implicated in disease phenotypes in humans and other organisms, suggesting that the variation we have identified here underlying adaptive phenotypes may be deleterious in nonurban settings but beneficial in urban environments. This pattern may seem paradoxical, but it has also been shown in previous studies that genes most closely tied to functional relevance may also represent candidates for maximizing fitness across diverse environments, such as variation for immunity, diet and subsistence, and bone development linked to positive selection in humans ( 68 70 ). Our observation here with anoles opens the possibility that genes of high evolutionary conservation could also be involved in adaptation to urban environments and worth pursuing in the future.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…We find that several loci associated with adaptive morphological changes are implicated in disease phenotypes in humans and other organisms, suggesting that the variation we have identified here underlying adaptive phenotypes may be deleterious in nonurban settings but beneficial in urban environments. This pattern may seem paradoxical, but it has also been shown in previous studies that genes most closely tied to functional relevance may also represent candidates for maximizing fitness across diverse environments, such as variation for immunity, diet and subsistence, and bone development linked to positive selection in humans ( 68 70 ). Our observation here with anoles opens the possibility that genes of high evolutionary conservation could also be involved in adaptation to urban environments and worth pursuing in the future.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%