2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2020.02.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolutionary Dynamics of the Spindle Assembly Checkpoint in Eukaryotes

Abstract: The tremendous diversity in eukaryotic life forms can ultimately be traced back to evolutionary modifications at the level of molecular networks. Deep understanding of these modifications will not only explain cellular diversity, but will also uncover different ways to execute similar processes and expose the evolutionary 'rules' that shape the molecular networks. Here, we review the evolutionary dynamics of the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC), a signaling network that guards fidelity of chromosome segregati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
54
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 170 publications
0
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…S8 ). This contrasts with the RVSF SLiM, which binds PP1 to KNL1 and is present throughout the eukaryotic tree of life ( Kops et al, 2020 ; Tromer et al, 2015 ; van Hooff et al, 2017 ; Fig. S8 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…S8 ). This contrasts with the RVSF SLiM, which binds PP1 to KNL1 and is present throughout the eukaryotic tree of life ( Kops et al, 2020 ; Tromer et al, 2015 ; van Hooff et al, 2017 ; Fig. S8 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The full list of annotated and excluded PBMs is included in Data S1 . The majority of KNL1 sequences used to determine presence/absence of the KNL1-RVSF were published previously ( Kops et al, 2020 ; Tromer et al, 2015 ; van Hooff et al, 2017 ). Any unannotated genomes were searched by blast using KNL1 orthologues from the closest species.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[ 91 ] They could explain how the network is being shaped to the “needs” of different eukaryotes. [ 92 ]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[9,12,14,15,17,18] Collectively, these observations strongly support the notion that NPCs and the SAC have extensive and ancient shared functions. [86] Intriguingly, the SAC is regulated by Nups that are not recruited to kinetochores. Instead, the impact on SAC function stems from the ability of Mad1 to interact with NPCs.…”
Section: Co-evolution Of Nups and Sac Proteinsmentioning
confidence: 99%