Advanced Photonics 2018 (BGPP, IPR, NP, NOMA, Sensors, Networks, SPPCom, SOF) 2018
DOI: 10.1364/sppcom.2018.spm4g.4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolutionary Design of Pulse-Shaping FIR Filter to Mitigate Fiber Nonlinearity

Abstract: We use evolutionary strategy to design an irregular pulse-shaping filter to mitigate nonlinear distortion in fiber-optic transmission. Our optimized filter achieves greater than 0.2 dB gain over RRC Nyquist shaping with zero additional cost in computational complexity.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The symbol rate, R s , corresponds to a standard symbol rate of 1.44 Gbit/s [12]. Additionally, in practice, p(t) is the impulse response of a digital FIR filter, which is implemented using a finite number of symmetric taps to avoid long processing delays [22]. Therefore, the impact of ISI introduced by a finite number of interfering symbols before and after the desired symbol is considered in (7).…”
Section: Inter-symbol Interference Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The symbol rate, R s , corresponds to a standard symbol rate of 1.44 Gbit/s [12]. Additionally, in practice, p(t) is the impulse response of a digital FIR filter, which is implemented using a finite number of symmetric taps to avoid long processing delays [22]. Therefore, the impact of ISI introduced by a finite number of interfering symbols before and after the desired symbol is considered in (7).…”
Section: Inter-symbol Interference Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the impact of ISI introduced by a finite number of interfering symbols before and after the desired symbol is considered in (7). The number of interfering symbols listed in Table I is in line with the typical filter half-length required for a (2L + 1)-tap symmetric FIR filter [22], where L ≤ 31.…”
Section: Inter-symbol Interference Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%