2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0169-5347(03)00162-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolutionary demography of monocarpic perennials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

11
221
1
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 173 publications
(235 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
11
221
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…If within a species some individuals are in consistently favorable habitats for growth and/or survival, then, as Burd et al (2006) demonstrated, this may result in a reaction norm for flowering that encompasses a wide range of flowering sizes. This is consistent with the observation in natural systems that the size distribution of flowering and nonflowering individuals shows considerable overlap (Metcalf et al 2003). The extent to which individuals are in consistently good or poor conditions can be assessed by fitting mixed models with individualspecific terms (Rees et al 1999).…”
Section: Es Flowering Strategy: the Effect Of Habitat And Reproductivsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…If within a species some individuals are in consistently favorable habitats for growth and/or survival, then, as Burd et al (2006) demonstrated, this may result in a reaction norm for flowering that encompasses a wide range of flowering sizes. This is consistent with the observation in natural systems that the size distribution of flowering and nonflowering individuals shows considerable overlap (Metcalf et al 2003). The extent to which individuals are in consistently good or poor conditions can be assessed by fitting mixed models with individualspecific terms (Rees et al 1999).…”
Section: Es Flowering Strategy: the Effect Of Habitat And Reproductivsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Monocarpic plants, which reproduce once and then die, are ideal systems for testing demographic and evolutionary ideas because the cost of reproduction is easily quantified and the timing of flowering is a key determinant of fitness (Metcalf et al 2003). In monocarpic plants, flowering can be delayed for years or even decades, and to explain the adaptive significance of such reproductive delays, evolutionary biologists have traditionally focused on the relative costs and benefits (Cole 1954).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Costs of reproduction are key ingredients of most theories of life-history evolution because these costs strongly influence the fitness payoffs of alternative reproductive strategies [3,4]. Semelparous (also called 'monocarpic') plants, which pay the ultimate cost of reproduction (flowering is fatal), have provided powerful empirical models for studying selection on life-history strategies, especially the occurrence and duration of reproductive delays (reviewed in [5]). The benefit of a reproductive delay is that older, larger plants have greater fecundity during their single reproductive opportunity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The functions making up the kernel can often be estimated by regression; for example, size-dependent survival and fecundity can be fitted by generalized linear or additive models and growth by parametric or nonparametric regression (Metcalf et al 2003). Consequently, the appropriate model complexity for the available data can be identified using wellestablished statistical criteria and software rather than the typically ad hoc process of choosing the number of size classes and their boundaries.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%