Evolutionary Constraints of Phosphorylation in Eukaryotes, Prokaryotes, and Mitochondria

Abstract

High accuracy mass spectrometry has proven to be a powerful technology for the large scale identification of serine/threonine/tyrosine phosphorylation in the living cell. However, despite many described phosphoproteomes, there has been no comparative study of the extent of phosphorylation and its evolutionary conservation in all domains of life. Here we analyze the results of phosphoproteomics studies performed with the same technology in a diverse set of organisms. For the most ancient organisms, the prokaryotes, only a few hundred proteins have been found to be phosphorylated. Applying the same technology to eukaryotic species resulted in the detection of thousands of phosphorylation events. Evolutionary analysis shows that prokaryotic phosphoproteins are preferentially conserved in all living organisms, whereassite specific phosphorylation is not. Eukaryotic phosphosites are generally more conserved than their nonphosphorylated counterparts (with similar structural constraints) throughout the eukaryotic domain. Yeast and Caenorhabditis elegans are two exceptions, indicating that the majority of phosphorylation events evolved after the divergence of higher eukaryotes from yeast and reflecting the unusually large number of nematode-specific kinases. Mitochondria present an interesting intermediate link between the prokaryotic and eukaryotic domains. Applying the same technology to this organelle yielded 174 phosphorylation sites mapped to 74 proteins. Thus, the mitochondrial phosphoproteome is similarly sparse as the prokaryotic phosphoproteomes. As expected from the endosymbiotic theory, phosphorylated as well as nonphosphorylated mitochondrial proteins are significantly conserved in prokaryotes. However, mitochondrial phosphorylation sites are not conserved throughout prokaryotes, consistent with the notion that serine/threonine phosphorylation in prokaryotes occurred relatively recently in evolution. Thus, the phosphoproteome reflects major events in the evolution of life. Molecular & Cellular Proteomics 9:2642-2653, 2010.Reversible protein phosphorylation on serines, threonines, and tyrosines plays a crucial role in regulating processes in all living organisms ranging from prokaryotes to eukaryotes (1). Traditionally, phosphorylation has been detected in single, purified proteins using in vitro assays. Recent advances in mass spectrometry (MS)-based proteomics now allow the identification of in vivo phosphorylation sites with high accuracy (2-7). On-line databases such as PhosphoSite (8), Phospho.ELM (9), and PHOSIDA 1 (10) have collected and organized thousands of identified phosphosites. These databases as well as dedicated analysis environments such as NetworKIN (11,12) offer and use contextual information including structural features, potential kinases, and conservation. They constitute resources that should allow the derivation of general patterns for phosphorylation events. Specifically, the recent availability of data for archaeal, prokaryotic, and diverse eukaryotic phosphoproteomes in these databa...

Meta-Analysis of Arabidopsis thaliana Phospho-Proteomics Data Reveals Compartmentalization of Phosphorylation Motifs

“…Experimental and predicted protein p-sites from PhosPhAt have been used to assess conservation of p-sites in single-nucleotide polymorphisms (Riaño-Pachón et al, 2010) or phosphorylation hot spots (Christian et al, 2012). In other (nonplant) organisms, large-scale p-proteomics data sets have been successfully used to analyze kinase-specific phosphorylation (Linding et al, 2008;Xue et al, 2008;Newman et al, 2013), and in combination with protein-protein interaction data (Yachie et al, 2011;Song et al, 2012), this information has served to identify the evolution of protein regulation through protein phosphorylation (Boekhorst et al, 2008;Beltrao et al, 2009;Gnad et al, 2010;Pearlman et al, 2011). On a smaller scale, a cross-species comparison were performed between rice (Oryza sativa) and Arabidopsis (Nakagami et al, 2010), allowing for a discussion of the role of conserved protein p-sites.…”

Quantification of Mitochondrial Acetylation Dynamics Highlights Prominent Sites of Metabolic Regulation

“…In recent years, fueled by technological advances in mass spectrometrybased proteomics, lysine acetylation has become recognized as a widespread post-translational modification (PTM) 3 that rivals phosphorylation and ubiquitination in its prevalence (3)(4)(5). Metabolic enzymes, including many in mitochondria, are among the most heavily acetylated proteins (6 -8).…”

CTL0511 from Chlamydia trachomatis Is a Type 2C Protein Phosphatase with Broad Substrate Specificity

“…Reversible phosphorylation of proteins is a posttranslational regulatory mechanism involved in multiple complex processes, including cell signaling, growth, and differentiation, in both eukaryotes and prokaryotes (9,10). Regulation at the molecular level is mediated by the addition or removal of a phosphate group from select amino acids (typically Ser, Thr, Tyr, His, and Asp) by the opposing actions of protein kinases and their cognate phosphatases serving to modulate the activity, interactions, and localization of target proteins (11,12).…”