2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10732-017-9330-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolutionary computation for automatic Web service composition: an indirect representation approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
56
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Future work can investigate variable neighborhood with combinations of more than one local search operators in one evolutionary process, and investigate memetic EDA for handling multiobjective service composition problems. TABLE 2: Mean fitness values for our approach in comparison to NHM-EDA [12], PSO [10], MEGA [9] and GA. (Note: the higher the fitness the better) Dataset…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Future work can investigate variable neighborhood with combinations of more than one local search operators in one evolutionary process, and investigate memetic EDA for handling multiobjective service composition problems. TABLE 2: Mean fitness values for our approach in comparison to NHM-EDA [12], PSO [10], MEGA [9] and GA. (Note: the higher the fitness the better) Dataset…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We conduct experiments to evaluate the performances of our memetic EDA-based approaches, i.e., memetic EDA with constrained one-point swap (henceforth referred to as MEEDA-OP), memetic EDA with constrained two-point swap (henceforth referred to as MEEDA-TP), memetic EDA with constrained layer-based one-point swap (henceforth referred to as MEEDA-LOP) and memetic EDA with constrained one-block swap (henceforth referred to as MEEDA-OB). These memetic EDA-based approaches are compared to some state-of-the-art EC-based methods that were recently proposed to solve the same or similar problems: a PSO-based approach [10] (henceforth referred to as PSO), a GA-based approach (henceforth referred to as GA), a memetic GA-based approach [9] (henceforth referred to as MEGA) and an EDA-based approach [12] (henceforth referred to as NHM-EDA). Two benchmarks, WSC-08 [1] and WSC-09 [2] extended with QoS attributes , which generated from the QoS distribution from QWS [30] are created.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations