2022
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-20862-1_42
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolutionary Automated Feature Engineering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this section, we compare performance results of automated and traditional feature engineering techniques commonly employed in practice and in the scientific literature. The first set of results (shown in Table 5) show classification accuracies (F-1 scores [292]) obtained from experimental evaluations by several authors -specifically, [59], [278], [288], [293]. The feature engineering methods compared are the following.…”
Section: Performance Of Automated Feature Engineering Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In this section, we compare performance results of automated and traditional feature engineering techniques commonly employed in practice and in the scientific literature. The first set of results (shown in Table 5) show classification accuracies (F-1 scores [292]) obtained from experimental evaluations by several authors -specifically, [59], [278], [288], [293]. The feature engineering methods compared are the following.…”
Section: Performance Of Automated Feature Engineering Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the literature, this approach is commonly referred to as Expansion-Reduction. The rest of the methods are LFE [278], NFS [59], AutoFeat [245] and DiFFER [288]. We selected 23 datasets where performance results are widely available for many of the aforementioned automamted feature engineering approaches.…”
Section: Performance Of Automated Feature Engineering Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations