We investigate how four types of interference competition that affect foraging, metabolism, survival, and reproduction impact the ecology and evolution of size-structured populations. Surprisingly, even though all four types of interference competition reduce population bio-mass, interference competition at intermediate strengths sometimes significantly increases the abundance of adult individuals and the population's reproduction rate. We find that the evolu-tionary response to foraging and metabolic interference is smaller maturation size at low to intermediate interference intensity and larger maturation size at high interference intensity. The evolutionary response to survival and reproductive interference is always larger matura-tion size. We also investigate how the four types of interference competition impact the evolu-tionary dynamics and resultant structure of size-structured communities. Like other types of trait-mediated competition, all four types of interference competition can induce disruptive selection and thus initial diversification. Even though foraging and reproductive interference are more prone to induce initial diversification, they catalyze the formation of diverse com-munities with complex trophic structure only at high levels of interference intensity. By con-trast survival interference does so already at intermediate levels.Reproductive interference supports relatively smaller communities with simpler trophic structure. Taken together, our results demonstrate the importance of interference competition in ecology and evolution. Recent theoretical advances in evolutionary ecology have highlighted interference competition between individuals as a key factor promoting species coexistence and the emergence of diverse communities over evolutionary time scales. Due to a fundamental limitation of traditional unstructured population models, these advances build on the assumption that interference increases individual mortality. This, however, is only one out of several possibilities.In the submitted manuscript, we carry out the first systematic investigation of how different types of interference between individuals impact the ecology and evolution of populations and food webs. Building on an established physiologically structured population model, we show how four salient types of interference can be mechanistically modelled. We find that these differ significantly in their ecological and evolutionary impacts. In addition to providing new insights, we believe that this manuscript will be an important reference for future studies of interference competition and physiologically structured populations. This work has not been published or accepted for publication elsewhere, and is not under consideration for publication in another journal or book. The submission of this work for publication has been approved by all authors and relevant institutions.