Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2001
DOI: 10.1006/mpev.2000.0888
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolutionary Assembly of the Milkweed Fauna: Cytochrome Oxidase I and the Age of TetraopesBeetles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

15
149
3
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 186 publications
(168 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
(87 reference statements)
15
149
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We assumed the rates of evolution of 0.0075 and 0.012 substitutions/site/MY to cover the range of rates reported (Farrell, 2001;Juan et al, 1995) and used for Coleopteran COI region in the literature (Brower, 1994;Leys et al, 2003;Ribera and Vogler, 2004;Smith and Farrell, 2005). The rates estimated for the Coleopteran COI region, which is exactly the same region as used here, are based on pooled codon positions and a time range of 1-20 MY (Farrell, 2001;Juan et al, 1995). As the level of variability (Appendix B) and the evolutionary models suggested by Modeltest for the COI and Cytb regions were comparable, we pooled these two regions in the estimation of divergence times.…”
Section: Phylogenetic Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We assumed the rates of evolution of 0.0075 and 0.012 substitutions/site/MY to cover the range of rates reported (Farrell, 2001;Juan et al, 1995) and used for Coleopteran COI region in the literature (Brower, 1994;Leys et al, 2003;Ribera and Vogler, 2004;Smith and Farrell, 2005). The rates estimated for the Coleopteran COI region, which is exactly the same region as used here, are based on pooled codon positions and a time range of 1-20 MY (Farrell, 2001;Juan et al, 1995). As the level of variability (Appendix B) and the evolutionary models suggested by Modeltest for the COI and Cytb regions were comparable, we pooled these two regions in the estimation of divergence times.…”
Section: Phylogenetic Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conventional wisdom is that two closely related plant species should be more likely to be susceptible to the same plant pathogens than would plants that are evolutionarily distant, because the morphological and chemical traits of plants that regulate interactions with pathogens are often phylogenetically conserved (15). Indeed, recent work has shown a strong phylogenetic signal in host range of herbivorous insects in tropical rain forest (16,17), and there is qualitative support for such a signal for fungal pathogens (7).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Th e present study aims at determining the taxonomic status of these populations through sequence comparison and phylogenetic analysis at mitochondrial loci documented for other South American populations (COI and COII). Th ese mitochondrial markers have been useful to diagnose and delimit species previously (Farrel 2001;Roe & Sperling 2007) and they have been employed in previous studies of phylogenetic relationships of Tephritidae (Smith-Caldas et al 2001;Alberti et al 2008).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%