2009
DOI: 10.3989/ajbm.2224
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolutionary analysis of five bryophyte families using virtual fossils

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Zander (2009) argued that many or even most new species arise out of more broadly distributed ancestral species that are phylogenetically structured, so the newly evolved species will be phylogenetically embedded within a larger ancestral taxon, rendering the latter paraphyletic (Zander 2007). Zander (2009) thus proposed that traditional taxa resolved as paraphyletic or polyphyletic based upon gene tree analyses may be interpreted as populations of surviving ancestors that are phenotypically static through processes like stabilizing selection, whereas the newly evolving species experienced faster morphological evolution, perhaps because of smaller effective population sizes.…”
Section: Hedenäs 2008mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zander (2009) argued that many or even most new species arise out of more broadly distributed ancestral species that are phylogenetically structured, so the newly evolved species will be phylogenetically embedded within a larger ancestral taxon, rendering the latter paraphyletic (Zander 2007). Zander (2009) thus proposed that traditional taxa resolved as paraphyletic or polyphyletic based upon gene tree analyses may be interpreted as populations of surviving ancestors that are phenotypically static through processes like stabilizing selection, whereas the newly evolving species experienced faster morphological evolution, perhaps because of smaller effective population sizes.…”
Section: Hedenäs 2008mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another possible explanation for incongruencies of gene trees and species trees is hybridization [40]. Alternatively, these results may be viewed as the persistence of isolated ancestral molecular races that form their own molecular lin-eages in evolutionary stasis [42] and have their own phylogenetically distinct descendant morphospecies. At this point, we cannot decide which of the mechanisms may explain the inconsistencies of the rbcL tree with the ITS tree and the morphological data, but in any case, the ITS tree is in good accordance with the morphological data and only a minor fraction of the samples shows these problems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Molecular cladograms of the authors of papers having to do with the Pottiaceae have in the past been examined (Zander, 2008a,b;20092014a,b,c) for two kinds of evolutionary information helpful in devising an evolution-based classification. (1) Heterophyly, meaning paraphyly or short-range apparent molecular polyphyly, which is taken to imply serial macroevolution, that is, one taxon giving rise to another of equal or higher rank.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%