2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01280.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolutionary Advantage of Small Populations on Complex Fitness Landscapes

Abstract: Recent experimental and theoretical studies have shown that small asexual populations evolving on complex fitness landscapes may achieve a higher fitness than large ones due to the increased heterogeneity of adaptive trajectories. Here, we introduce a

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

4
59
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
4
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Clonal interference introduces a bias favoring mutations of large effect (32, 33), thus bringing the dynamics closer to the "greedy" limit, in which the mutation of largest effect is fixed deterministically in each step (34,35). Although this in itself tends to reduce the heterogeneity of evolutionary trajectories (12, 35-37) and thus increases predictability, it is counteracted by the increasing availability of genotypes carrying multiple mutations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clonal interference introduces a bias favoring mutations of large effect (32, 33), thus bringing the dynamics closer to the "greedy" limit, in which the mutation of largest effect is fixed deterministically in each step (34,35). Although this in itself tends to reduce the heterogeneity of evolutionary trajectories (12, 35-37) and thus increases predictability, it is counteracted by the increasing availability of genotypes carrying multiple mutations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the absence of standing genetic variation, small populations are expected to explore more trajectories than larger populations because of the low supply of beneficial mutations, and variation in what particular mutation arises across populations [18][19][20]. Trajectories and outcomes in small populations are therefore predicted to be less repeatable than in large populations because of the higher contribution of chance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clonal interference [5][6][7] will tend to lead to the fixation of the mutations with largest beneficial effect [21,22] and to a reduction in the number of different trajectories taken by independent lineages [18]. As such, adaptation in large populations is predicted to be more repeatable because of the greater efficiency of selection and lower contribution of chance [18][19][20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The essence of the FM mechanism is the competition between independently arising beneficial mutations, termed clonal interference, which slows down the adaptation of large asexual populations (Gerrish and Lenski 1998;Miralles et al 1999;Wilke 2004;Kim and Orr 2005;Park and Krug 2007;Fogle et al 2008;Sniegowski and Gerrish 2010;Schiffels et al 2011). The concept of clonal interference has played an important role in interpreting the behavior observed in laboratory selection experiments (Lenski et al 1991;Lenski and Travisano 1994;Barrick et al 2009) and has also been invoked in explaining the population-size dependence of evolutionary predictability in rugged fitness landscapes (Jain et al 2011;Szendro et al 2013a). Although in its original formulation clonal interference theory neglects the occurrence of secondary beneficial mutations within a growing clone (Gerrish and Lenski 1998;Gerrish 2001), in general the coexistence of multiple beneficial mutations cannot be neglected in large populations (Park and Krug 2007).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept of clonal interference has played an important role in interpreting the behavior observed in laboratory selection experiments (Lenski et al 1991;Lenski and Travisano 1994;Barrick et al 2009) and has also been invoked in explaining the population-size dependence of evolutionary predictability in rugged fitness landscapes (Jain et al 2011;Szendro et al 2013a). Although in its original formulation clonal interference theory neglects the occurrence of secondary beneficial mutations within a growing clone (Gerrish and Lenski 1998;Gerrish 2001), in general the coexistence of multiple beneficial mutations cannot be neglected in large populations (Park and Krug 2007).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%