Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
1969
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-010-3405-0_32
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolution Through Mass Exchange in Close Binary Systems of Total Mass 2.5 M ⊙

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
125
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(128 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
125
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, none of these processes have been applied to a binarystar evolution code that consistently follows the stellar spin velocity and all torques owing to mass accretion and mass loss. A&A 557, A40 (2013) It has also been shown that some Algol systems must be nonconservative to comply with observations of mass ratios (for example Refsdal et al 1974;Massevitch & Yungelson 1975;Mezzetti et al 1980;Sarna 1993;Nelson & Eggleton 2001). Yet, only mass loss through the outer Lagrangian point L 3 (Sytov et al 2007), bipolar jets (Ak et al 2007) or hotspot formation (van Rensbergen et al 2011) have been proposed to account for this kind of evolution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, none of these processes have been applied to a binarystar evolution code that consistently follows the stellar spin velocity and all torques owing to mass accretion and mass loss. A&A 557, A40 (2013) It has also been shown that some Algol systems must be nonconservative to comply with observations of mass ratios (for example Refsdal et al 1974;Massevitch & Yungelson 1975;Mezzetti et al 1980;Sarna 1993;Nelson & Eggleton 2001). Yet, only mass loss through the outer Lagrangian point L 3 (Sytov et al 2007), bipolar jets (Ak et al 2007) or hotspot formation (van Rensbergen et al 2011) have been proposed to account for this kind of evolution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been shown that systemic angular-momentum losses (and thus mass losses) must be involved to reproduce the current state of some observed Algols. For example, Refsdal et al (1974) found that only a nonconservative evolution can reproduce the system AS Eridani. Massevitch & Yungelson (1975) noticed that Algol models must lose at least 40% of their mass in order to reproduce the observed Appendices are available in electronic form at http://www.aanda.org properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Past work (Paczyński & Ziółkowski 1967;Refsdal et al 1974;De Greve & De Loore 1992;Chen & Han 2002 employed mass transfer efficiency β = 0.5 for the calculation of stellar evolution in nonconservative cases. However, De Mink et al (2007) suggested that mass transfer efficiency should not be a single constant by comparing their models with a sample of 50 doublelined eclipsing binaries in the Small Magellanic Cloud, which could be affected by spin up of the accreting star and tidal interaction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We take the mass transfer efficiency β = 1.0 for the conservative case, and β = 0.5 for the nonconservative case, since the results of Paczyński & Ziółkowski (1967) and Refsdal et al (1974) indicate that β is around 0.5 in the nonconservative case. The parameter space for the model grid is three dimensional:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%