2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.123313
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolution properties and dechlorination capacities of particulate organic matter from a landfill

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The large difference in the flotation efficiency of the freshly spiked MPs and the landfill MPs is due to the aging of MPs in mineralized refuse. For example, some environmental substrates, such as humic substances, exhibit strong hydrophobicity and stable hydrophobic structures , and tend to combine with MPs through physical adsorption during aging; they may not be easily removed by H 2 O 2 digestion, thereby preventing the MPs from floating. In addition, H 2 O 2 digestion may not eliminate interference by minerals. Therefore, the frequently used flotation method may lead to obvious omission of MPs and result in underestimation of MP pollution in landfills.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The large difference in the flotation efficiency of the freshly spiked MPs and the landfill MPs is due to the aging of MPs in mineralized refuse. For example, some environmental substrates, such as humic substances, exhibit strong hydrophobicity and stable hydrophobic structures , and tend to combine with MPs through physical adsorption during aging; they may not be easily removed by H 2 O 2 digestion, thereby preventing the MPs from floating. In addition, H 2 O 2 digestion may not eliminate interference by minerals. Therefore, the frequently used flotation method may lead to obvious omission of MPs and result in underestimation of MP pollution in landfills.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the biodegradation of polymers, it was found that certain bacterial strains were able to biodegrade plastics in soil [19,[24][25][26][27][28], in contrast to other studies that used bacterial consortia [29][30][31][32], resulting in a significant reduction in these contaminants as well as a reduction in biodegradation time by 90 days [30] and 30 days [31], demonstrating that the symbiotic capacity of bacteria can be a viable option. Finally, there is the bioremediation of organic matter, the most commonly used techniques were the isolation of bacteria [33,34], and some studies specifically investigated the bioremediation capacity of Pseudomonas [35][36][37] and bacterial mixtures [38][39][40][41].…”
Section: Bioremediation Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of these studies focus on evaluating the efficiency of bioremediation by bacterial consortia [38][39][40][41]. Some of these studies used pseudomonas [35][36][37] and other studies selected specific bacteria [33,34], which generally resulted in a high degradation capacity of these contaminants.…”
Section: Organic Mattermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the treatment of industrial waste salt, landfill and incineration are the most commonly used methods [23]. Untreated organic wastes were landfilled, which not only causes serious pollution of soil, water, and air but also wastes salt resources [24][25][26][27]. Incineration is considered to be an effective treatment because it can efficiently decompose organic matter at high temperatures [28][29][30][31], so that the NaCl in the industrial waste salt can be recycled.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%