Evolution of U.S. Presidential Discourse over 230 Years: A Psycholinguistic Perspective

Abstract

Much of recent research on U.S presidential discourse has focused on the nexus between language forms and their underlying social processes and psychological states. However, little work has been done to shed light on how these latent characteristics have evolved over time. This study investigated the evolution of three psychological states (authenticity, affect, and time orientation) underlying U.S. presidential discourse over approximately 230 years (1789–2016). Based on one of the most comprehensive corpora of presidential speech transcripts, Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC) 2015, a text analysis software, was utilized to explore these psychological states. To see the overall trend of these states across U.S. presidential history as a whole, initial analysis was based on LIWC indices, which showed that, 1) overall, authenticity level is on a steady increase in U.S. presidential discourse; 2) in the presidents’ speeches, positive emotions invariably outweigh negative emotions, and both types of emotion remain relatively constant in the long run; 3) the discourse of “focus on present” consistently outweighs the discourse of “focus on future”, which outweighs the discourse of “focus on past”. To see whether the general trend holds across different parties, a series of independent samples t-tests were first performed to check for significant difference. The results indicated that in all the three psychological states, there was no significant difference between the Democratic presidents and the Republican presidents, and that the trend in different parties is in agreement with the overall trend. Subsequent visualization of the LIWC indices according to party generally corroborated these results, with only one exception: authenticity levels are on a steady increase in the discourse of the Democratic presidents, but in the Republican presidents, there was a sharp increase in recent years.

A Psycholinguistic Analysis of World Leaders’ Discourses Concerning the Covid-19 Context: Authenticity and Emotional Tone

“…This linguistic pattern was observed in previous studies on authenticity (Petersoo, 2007). On the other hand, all subjects presented time-oriented speeches (Chen and Hu, 2019) despite of their negativity and anxiety in high representative samples (Baas, 2008). The case of China is very particular considering that the virus origin was in Wuhan and the leader' discourses presented higher emotional tone but lack of authenticity (unrevealed information that is currently causing feeling of disruption about transparency) (Zhao et al, 2020).…”

“…Time orientation (focus on past, present or future), context (a parliamentary setting, for example) and affect are important to detect authenticity in discourses (Chen and Hu, 2019). The main question remains in the affect identification.…”

Digital reading in Vietnamese universities: The situation and influencing factors

“…According to Chen and Hu (2019), reading engagement strongly impacts the academic achievement of students. The more reading activities students join in with, the higher their academic performance (Xiao and Hu, 2019).…”

Differentiating the learning styles of college students in different disciplines in a college English blended learning setting

“…The academic discipline only serves to strengthen or diminish this difference. For instance, decades of research in psychology have shown that males are more inclined towards risk taking than females [118][119][120][121]. A careful examination of the current academic landscape reveals a gender difference; more females choose soft disciplines than males, and more males choose hard disciplines than females.…”