2015
DOI: 10.1088/0022-3727/48/46/465308
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolution of topography and material removal during nanoscale grinding

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
15
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
15
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Refs. [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27]. During the last decade, additionally, the use of density functional theory (DFT) calculations has been introduced in nanotribology, see, e.g., Refs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Refs. [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27]. During the last decade, additionally, the use of density functional theory (DFT) calculations has been introduced in nanotribology, see, e.g., Refs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We reduced its thickness to several monolayers and kept it rigid to have most of the computational resources available for the simulation of the microstructural evolution of the polycrystalline CuNi sample, which implies that the counterbody is much harder than the sample. Lennard–Jones potentials controlled the interactions between the counterbody and the sample, effectively implying a third body, with the global energy parameter eV obtained as described in [ 36 ], while nm and nm were calculated from interactomic first-neighbor distances using the Lorentz–Berthelot mixing rules.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fact that the atoms in the counterbody are constrained to be fixed with respect to each other simulates a much harder material than that of the base body. Lennard-Jones potentials controlled the interactions between the counterbody and the sample, which implies a third body, with the global energy parameter = 0.095 eV obtained as described in [41], while Fe-Cu = 0.224 nm and Fe-Ni = 0.221 nm were calculated from interatomic first-neighbor distances using the Lorentz-Berthelot mixing rules.…”
Section: Simulation Visualization and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%