2010
DOI: 10.1097/sla.0b013e3181db31ea
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolution of the Surgeon-Volume, Patient Outcome Relationship

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
3
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
(3 reference statements)
0
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The effects of surgeon experience on clinical outcomes have been reported for other surgical fields, with varying results (6,9). In our study, no significant difference was found in hospitalization expenses according to the operation case order or the experience of the surgeon.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 45%
“…The effects of surgeon experience on clinical outcomes have been reported for other surgical fields, with varying results (6,9). In our study, no significant difference was found in hospitalization expenses according to the operation case order or the experience of the surgeon.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 45%
“…This adds further evidence to the conclusion by Burns et al 19 mentioned above – that centralisation may be ineffective in improving results unless the higher volume is directed towards high‐quality providers. This recommendation has been echoed by others 50,64 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…We included this contribution to LOS in our study. It has also been suggested that there may be publication bias that may contribute to the impression of the importance of hospital volume 50 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation