2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.gde.2020.05.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolution of the mutation rate across primates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
51
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since generation times vary among species, direct estimates of the mutation rate across species are difficult to compare. Nevertheless, current data suggest at least a twofold range of mutation rates among primates (Chintalapati and Moorjani 2020). In almost all primate species studied to date, paternal age has an effect on the number of inherited mutations (Kong et al 2012;Venn et al 2014;Goldmann et al 2016;Thomas et al 2018;Besenbacher et al 2019;Bergeron et al 2020;Wang et al 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Since generation times vary among species, direct estimates of the mutation rate across species are difficult to compare. Nevertheless, current data suggest at least a twofold range of mutation rates among primates (Chintalapati and Moorjani 2020). In almost all primate species studied to date, paternal age has an effect on the number of inherited mutations (Kong et al 2012;Venn et al 2014;Goldmann et al 2016;Thomas et al 2018;Besenbacher et al 2019;Bergeron et al 2020;Wang et al 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…An alternative to the phylogenetic estimation of u is to rely on high-throughput sequencing of pedigrees. As of yet, such estimates are available only for 7 primates (Chintalapati & Moorjani, 2020), but this is likely to change in the future. For these 7 species, the phylogenetic estimates obtained here are higher than pedigree-based estimates, thus in line with previous observations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For these 7 species, the phylogenetic estimates obtained here are higher than pedigree-based estimates, thus in line with previous observations. The reasons for this discrepancy are not yet well-understood (Scally & Durbin, 2012; Ségurel et al , 2014; Chintalapati & Moorjani, 2020). Interestingly, accounting for coalescence in the ancestral populations contributes a lot to making phylogenetic estimates closer to those obtained in the same species by sequencing pedigrees, although not entirely.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of technical difficulties stand in the way of this comparison. Germline mutations are rare (on the order of 100 in a 6-Gb genome) [39]. Reliable estimates are therefore exquisitely sensitive to false negative and positive rates, which, in turn, depend on sequencing coverage, the reference genome quality, and the variant-calling pipeline.…”
Section: Plos Biologymentioning
confidence: 99%