2006
DOI: 10.1063/1.2176109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolution of the magnetic properties and magnetic structures along the RmMIn3m+2 (R=Ce, Nd, Gd, Tb; M=Rh, Ir; and m=1,2) series of intermetallic compounds

Abstract: We discuss the evolution of the magnetic properties and magnetic structures along the series of intermetallic compounds RmMIn3m+2 (R=Ce, Nd, Gd, Tb; M=Rh, Ir; and m=1,2). The m=1,2 are, respectively, the single layer and bilayer tetragonal derivatives of their cubic RIn3 relatives. Using a mean field model including an isotropic first-neighbors Ruderman-Kittel-Kasuya-Yoshida interaction (K) and the tetragonal crystalline electrical field (CEF), we demonstrated that, for realistic values of K and CEF parameters… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
58
0
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(24 reference statements)
4
58
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…For both materials, the magnetic susceptibility is larger for a field applied along the c axis, in agreement to what was found for the compounds in the In-based R m M n In 3m+2n ͑M = Co, Rh, or Ir, M =1,2͒ series ͑except for R =Gd͒. [24][25][26][27][28] For the whole series, the susceptibility is anisotropic and the ratio ʈ / Ќ taken at T N is mainly determined by the tetragonal crystalline electrical field ͑CEF͒ and reflects to some extent the CEF anisotropy. The ratio remains nearly constant as a function of Cd doping for each family, for example, for M = Rh the values of the ratio are roughly 1.6 and 1.5 for the samples with x = 0.21 and 0.03, respectively.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…For both materials, the magnetic susceptibility is larger for a field applied along the c axis, in agreement to what was found for the compounds in the In-based R m M n In 3m+2n ͑M = Co, Rh, or Ir, M =1,2͒ series ͑except for R =Gd͒. [24][25][26][27][28] For the whole series, the susceptibility is anisotropic and the ratio ʈ / Ќ taken at T N is mainly determined by the tetragonal crystalline electrical field ͑CEF͒ and reflects to some extent the CEF anisotropy. The ratio remains nearly constant as a function of Cd doping for each family, for example, for M = Rh the values of the ratio are roughly 1.6 and 1.5 for the samples with x = 0.21 and 0.03, respectively.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…1 using a mean field model including the anisotropic interaction from nearestneighbors as well as the tetragonal CEF hamiltonian 14 for CeAu 0.92 Bi 1.6 . This model was used to simultaneously fit vðTÞ and M(H) data, with T > 20 K as a constrain.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another remarkable result is the breakdown of the De Gennes scaling revealed by non-Kondo members of the REAgBi 2 [14] and RECuBi 2 [15] (RE = rare earth) families. This usually indicates a complex and non-trivial competition between RKKY interactions and tetragonal CEF [16][17][18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the compound CeCu 0.6 Bi 2 orders antiferromagnetically at T N = 12 K. The magnetic structure determination of CeCuBi 2 revealed a propagation vector (0 0 1 2 ) with the magnetic moments aligned along the c-axis. A systematic analysis of the magnetization and specific heat data within the framework of a mean field theory with influence of anisotropic first-neighbors interaction and tetragonal CEF [17] allowed us to extract the CEF scheme for CeCuBi 2 . It also led us to estimate the values of the anisotropic RKKY exchange parameters between the Ce 3+ ions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%