2011
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201116577
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolution of the dust coma in comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko before the 2009 perihelion

Abstract: Context. Comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko is the main target of ESA's Rosetta mission and will be encountered in May 2014. Because the spacecraft will orbit the comet nucleus before and after release of the lander Philae, it is necessary to know the conditions in the coma. Aims. We study the dust environment, including the dust production rate and its variations along the comet's pre-perihelion orbit. Methods. The comet was observed during its approach to the Sun on four epochs between early-June 2008 and mid-J… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
25
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(56 reference statements)
3
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After a more or less steep increase in the inner part of the coma, which is affected by the seeing and observable in all targets, for most of the comets (C/2005 L3, C/2007 M1, C/2008 FK75 C/2009 S3, C/2010 R1, and C/2011 L4) it is possible to clearly identify a decrease in Afρ with the nucleocentric distance ρ. A similar decrease has been often attributed to non steady state dust emission and possibly dust grain fading or destruction (Lara et al 2004;Tozzi et al 2003) and/or to fresh dust production within the coma, even if the latter process is more likely to be observed during close passages to the Sun (Tozzi et al 2011). This decrease is not observed for the remaining two comets (C/2005 S4 and C/2007 JA21), but it could be that the relatively small apparent coma extension and low activity level prevented such a detection with our data.…”
Section: Afρmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…After a more or less steep increase in the inner part of the coma, which is affected by the seeing and observable in all targets, for most of the comets (C/2005 L3, C/2007 M1, C/2008 FK75 C/2009 S3, C/2010 R1, and C/2011 L4) it is possible to clearly identify a decrease in Afρ with the nucleocentric distance ρ. A similar decrease has been often attributed to non steady state dust emission and possibly dust grain fading or destruction (Lara et al 2004;Tozzi et al 2003) and/or to fresh dust production within the coma, even if the latter process is more likely to be observed during close passages to the Sun (Tozzi et al 2011). This decrease is not observed for the remaining two comets (C/2005 S4 and C/2007 JA21), but it could be that the relatively small apparent coma extension and low activity level prevented such a detection with our data.…”
Section: Afρmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Agarwal et al (2007) and Vincent et al (2013) discuss the large scale and fine structure morphology of the comet in detail. Tozzi et al (2011) found that A f ρ varied with ρ for observations of 67P at r = 2.3 AU pre-perihelion, and so the coma did not behave as 1/ρ. We find that 67P does not match the steady state assumption over a wider range in heliocentric distance, by measuring the slope of the radial profile in all the archival data sets.…”
Section: Dust Productionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In this paper we present data taken in 2007 and 2008 around the time of the expected onset, between the inactive nucleus observations taken in 2007 (Tubiana et al 2011;Lowry et al 2012) and the active comet observations in 2008 (Tozzi et al 2011). 20 × 30 (0) R 27/3/08 3.39 3.80 14.6 3×15 + 4×60 (6) VRI 29/3/08 3.38 3.76 14.9 3×15 + 4×60 (6) VRI 30/3/08 3.38 3.74 15.0 3×15 + 4×60 (6) VRI (a) Heliocentric distance (AU).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar trends of A f ρ vs. ρ, including the steep increase at small ρ with a comparable scale length, were already observed in several other comets at various heliocentric distances. We cite the data regarding comets C/1999 S4 (LINEAR) by Bonev et al (2002) and Tozzi & Licandro (2002), C/2000 WM1 (LINEAR) by Lara et al (2004) and Tozzi et al (2004), 9P/Tempel 1 by Tozzi et al (2007), C/2007 N3 (Lulin) by Woodward et al (2011), and 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko by Tozzi et al (2011). An intriguing explanation for the steepness of the A f ρ profiles, or equivalently of those of its derived parameter ΣA f (Tozzi & Licandro 2002), close to the nucleus was proposed by Tozzi et al (2004) for comet C/2000 WM1 (LINEAR).…”
Section: Af ρmentioning
confidence: 99%