1992
DOI: 10.1016/0010-938x(92)90075-e
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolution of the corrosion potential of repassivating aluminium surfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6] Other related techniques have also been used to create freshly bared areas on passive samples including breaking, 7,8 guillotining, [9][10][11][12][13][14] impingement with particles, 15 and laser irradiation. [16][17][18] These studies have provided considerable insight into the nature of passivity and the kinetics of repassivation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6] Other related techniques have also been used to create freshly bared areas on passive samples including breaking, 7,8 guillotining, [9][10][11][12][13][14] impingement with particles, 15 and laser irradiation. [16][17][18] These studies have provided considerable insight into the nature of passivity and the kinetics of repassivation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Burstein et al [19][20][21][22][23][24] found that the free corrosion potential of freshly generated aluminum surface increased linearly with the logarithm of time during repassivation as the result of oxide film growth. The linear relationship of corrosion potential (E) and log time (t) is suggested to follow Eq.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[19][20][21][22][23][24] This relationship between OCP and immersion time has been utilized to study the growth kinetics of oxide film formed on the bare metal surface [25][26][27][28][29][30][31] as well as at the coating/metal interface.…”
Section: 6mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An analysis of this behavior has been carried out by monitoring potential-or current-transients after mechanically stripping the oxide films. Ford et al 19) and Burstein et al [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28] have reported a re-passivation mechanism after removal of passive oxide film by the mechanically stripping technique. There are however problems with the mechanical film stripping techniques, such as low stripping rates, difficult to controling stripping area size of the oxide film and contamination from the stripping tools.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%