Evolution of Telehealth Technology, Evaluations, and Therapy: Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Pediatric Speech-Language Pathology Services

Abstract

Purpose: Telehealth services experienced exponential growth during the COVID-19 pandemic. This survey examined the resulting evolution in the technology, connectivity, implementation of services, and attitudes of pediatric speech-language pathology clinicians using synchronous videoconferencing. Method: The Telehealth Services: Pediatric Provider Survey participants were 259 speech-language clinicians in a variety of employment settings from across the country and abroad. Analyses identified telehealth barriers eliminated and those that persisted during the pandemic, advantages, and disadvantages of remote delivery of evaluation and treatment services, the most common telehealth technology used by clinicians and their clients to access care, and clinicians' predictions about the optimization and future of telehealth. Results: Elimination of regulatory and insurance hurdles allowed children from varying socioeconomic backgrounds living in rural, suburban, and urban areas access to telehealth. Telehealth technology shifted from computers with external hardware and specialized software to commercially available equipment, such as handheld portable devices with built-in audiovisual components and publicly available videoconferencing platforms. However, connectivity of these devices continued to be problematic, and lack of technology prevented some children from accessing care. Judgments about the appropriateness and effectiveness of evaluations and treatments varied based on the age and communication disorder of a child. Although some participants expressed uncertainty about the effectiveness of telehealth compared with in-person care, telehealth was widely recognized as a viable delivery method. Conclusions: Although clinicians reported many advantages of telehealth, some barriers identified reported prior to COVID-19 still persist. Clinicians anticipate that new developments have the potential to continue improving telehealth service delivery, bolstering the viability of telehealth long after the COVID-19 pandemic is gone. Supplemental Material https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.16959361

Telehealth Management of Dysphagia in Adults: A Survey of Speech Language Pathologists’ Experiences and Perceptions

“…The greater frequency of telehealth treatment visits, as compared to assessments, corroborates qualitative findings from the present study which revealed greater clinician uncertainty regarding tele-assessments and some degree of hesitation in making diagnostic decisions via telehealth. This finding has been reported across SLP services [ 45 , 50 – 52 ] and has been previously linked to dysphagia services as well [ 2 , 53 ]. Uncertainty regarding telehealth assessments was also reported by clinicians as a factor that lowered their confidence and perceived effectiveness, with lack of instrumental assessment specifically reported by some as a diagnostic barrier.…”

Educators' perceptions of barriers and facilitators to the implementation of screeners for developmental language disorder and dyslexia

“…Technology and internet connection problems are common barriers in the context of telepractice (Tucker, 2012). However, the pandemic and the dependence on digital education have exacerbated these problems, especially for students from low‐income communities (Benda et al, 2020; Campbell & Goldstein, 2021). Potential solutions to overcome limitations of remote screenings include improving compatibility of our screeners with different devices and supporting community efforts to extend the provision of high‐speed free internet to those who need it (Benda et al, 2020).…”

Supervising Students During a Global Pandemic: Clinical Educators’ Perceptions of a Student-Led Telerehabilitation Service During COVID-19

“…In this study, CEs in SP found the transition to telehealth easier than colleagues in the other disciplines. This most likely reflects the greater uptake of telehealth in the profession both at UQHRC and more broadly ( Campbell & Goldstein, 2022 ). Future implementation strategies should include development of context specific training resources for CEs which address the unique aspects of the clinical education environment (e.g., methods of providing student feedback).…”