2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2020.06.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolution of Targeted Prostate Biopsy by Adding Micro-Ultrasound to the Magnetic Resonance Imaging Pathway

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This suggests that micro-US may add significant information to current MRI approaches [84]. Similarly, in another study, the combination of micro-US and mpMRI was revealed as the best approach for the detection of clinically significant PCa [85].…”
Section: B2b: Prostate Cancer Summarymentioning
confidence: 88%
“…This suggests that micro-US may add significant information to current MRI approaches [84]. Similarly, in another study, the combination of micro-US and mpMRI was revealed as the best approach for the detection of clinically significant PCa [85].…”
Section: B2b: Prostate Cancer Summarymentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Here, the overdetection of additional 9.8% ISUP 1 by systematic biopsy is frequently considered tolerable [37]. Wiemer et al [38] recently reported comparable overall detection rates for PC through the combination of MRI-and micro-ultrasound-targeted biopsy as in the combination of MRI-targeted and nontargeted biopsy (66 vs. 65%) but a lower detection rate for PC graded ISUP 1 for the combined targeted approach (20 vs. 28%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wiemer et al. [ 34 ] reported on a cohort of 159 patients with mostly PI-RADS ≥3. The urologists were blinded to the MRI until the conclusion of the MUSGB.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The group did not report separate detection rates, but MUS sensitivity for csPC was comparable with the other groups on a patient level (95%). The positive predictive value on a lesion level of MRI and MUS was 30% and 41% ( p = 0.02), respectively [ 34 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%