2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2020.107431
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolution of stony debris flows in laboratory experiments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
1
6

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
2
19
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The main purpose here is to construct several new analytical solutions to (2), and combine these with the existing solutions (Pudasaini and Krautblatter, 2022) for (1). This facilitates the description of the landslide motion down a slope consisting of multiple segments with accelerating and decelerating movements, with positive and negative net driving forces, as well as the landslide run-out.…”
Section: The Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main purpose here is to construct several new analytical solutions to (2), and combine these with the existing solutions (Pudasaini and Krautblatter, 2022) for (1). This facilitates the description of the landslide motion down a slope consisting of multiple segments with accelerating and decelerating movements, with positive and negative net driving forces, as well as the landslide run-out.…”
Section: The Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Equivalently, β is the ratio between the one half of the "system-force", 1 2 mα (the driving force), and the (maximum) kinetic energy, 1 2 mu 2 max , of the landslide. With the knowledge of the relevant maximum kinetic energy of the landslide (Körner, 1980), the model (17) for the drag can be closed.…”
Section: A Model For Viscous Dragmentioning
confidence: 99%

The Landslide Velocity

Pudasaini,
Krautblatter
2021
Preprint
Self Cite
“…Dynamic data are rare (de Haas et al, 2020). So, many of the low-resolution measurements are locally or discretely based on points in time and space (Berger et al, 2011;Schürch et al, 2011;McCoy et al, 2012;Theule et al, 2015;Dietrich and Krautblatter, 2019). Therefore, laboratory or field experiments (Iverson et al, 2011; de Haas and van Woerkom, 2016;Lu et al, 2016;Lanzoni et al, 2017;Li et al, 2017;Pilvar et al, 2019;Baselt et al, 2021) and theoretical modeling (Le and Pitman, 2009;Pudasaini, 2012;Pudasaini and Mergili, 2019) remain the major source of knowledge in landslide and debris flow dynamics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So, many of the low-resolution measurements are locally or discretely based on points in time and space (Berger et al, 2011;Schürch et al, 2011;McCoy et al, 2012;Theule et al, 2015;Dietrich and Krautblatter, 2019). Therefore, laboratory or field experiments (Iverson et al, 2011; de Haas and van Woerkom, 2016;Lu et al, 2016;Lanzoni et al, 2017;Li et al, 2017;Pilvar et al, 2019;Baselt et al, 2021) and theoretical modeling (Le and Pitman, 2009;Pudasaini, 2012;Pudasaini and Mergili, 2019) remain the major source of knowledge in landslide and debris flow dynamics. Recently, there has been a rapid increase in comprehensive numerical modeling for mass transports (McDougall and Hungr, 2005;Medina et al, 2008;Cascini et al, 2014;Frank et al, 2015;Iverson and Ouyang, 2015;Cuomo et al, 2016;Mergili et al, 2020a, b;Qiao et al, 2019;Liu et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%