2023
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/202345847
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolution of rotating massive stars with new hydrodynamic wind models

Abstract: Context. Mass loss due to radiatively line-driven winds is central to our understanding of the evolution of massive stars in both single and multiple systems. This mass loss plays a key role in modulating the stellar evolution at different metallicities, particularly in the case of massive stars with M* ≥ 25 M⊙. Aims. We extend the evolution models introduced in Paper I, where the mass-loss recipe is based on the simultaneous calculation of the wind hydrodynamics and the line acceleration, by incorporating the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Dutch wind prescription orbits around the use of three different mass-loss models: one for thin winds (Vink et al 2001), one for thick winds where the switch from thin to thick winds is placed on the mass fraction of surface hydrogen X surf > 0.4 (Nugis & Lamers 2000), and one for dust-driven winds at effective temperature T eff < 10 kK (de Jager et al 1988). However, recent years offered various detailed studies of massive stars and their mass loss through stellar winds (e.g., Krtička & Kubát 2017;Björklund et al 2021;Gormaz-Matamala et al 2023). We take advantage of these new results to update our calculations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Dutch wind prescription orbits around the use of three different mass-loss models: one for thin winds (Vink et al 2001), one for thick winds where the switch from thin to thick winds is placed on the mass fraction of surface hydrogen X surf > 0.4 (Nugis & Lamers 2000), and one for dust-driven winds at effective temperature T eff < 10 kK (de Jager et al 1988). However, recent years offered various detailed studies of massive stars and their mass loss through stellar winds (e.g., Krtička & Kubát 2017;Björklund et al 2021;Gormaz-Matamala et al 2023). We take advantage of these new results to update our calculations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2022b;Björklund et al 2023;Gormaz-Matamala et al 2023), and therefore the mass-loss rates at subsequent evolutionary stages may be larger rather than smaller after adopting updated "lower" wind-mass-loss prescriptions. As another example, M  for H-rich W-R stars(Bestenlehner et al 2020) is lower than M  for H-poor stars) at the same luminosity, because they describe stars with a different L/M ratio (and thus different mass regimes).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%