2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.meegid.2019.103937
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolution of rifampicin treatment for tuberculosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
46
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
0
46
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite that, only 10 of those compounds are considered candidates for further development, presenting minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values below 64 µg/mL and a selectivity index (SI, CC 50 /MIC) higher than 10 [31]. Table 1 shows the activity of laurinterol and aplysin against nine M. tuberculosis strains, in comparison to that of rifampicin, the most common drug for TB treatment [32], used as positive control. Laurinterol inhibited eight out of the nine strains of Mtb, with MICs ≤ 100 µg/mL.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite that, only 10 of those compounds are considered candidates for further development, presenting minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values below 64 µg/mL and a selectivity index (SI, CC 50 /MIC) higher than 10 [31]. Table 1 shows the activity of laurinterol and aplysin against nine M. tuberculosis strains, in comparison to that of rifampicin, the most common drug for TB treatment [32], used as positive control. Laurinterol inhibited eight out of the nine strains of Mtb, with MICs ≤ 100 µg/mL.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compound 1 inhibited eight out of the nine strains of Mtb with MICs ≤ 100 μg/mL. M. tuberculosis CIPTIR-F296 was the most susceptible strain for both compounds; laurinterol was more active, showing MIC value of 25 µ g/mL, even lower than rifampicin (32 µ g/mL), the most used drug in TB treatment [32]. In comparison with TB treatments, the anti-NTM therapies have been remarkably neglected.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If FDCs are not used, it is also possible to suboptimally implement specific components of the regimen. During the continuation phase of treatment, suboptimal implementation of one drug will lead to monotherapy; the risk of drug resistance posed by monotherapy was illustrated by one of the first rifampicin trials in 1968 [77,78]. As a result, the current ethical maximum for monotherapy studies is 14 days [79].…”
Section: Suboptimal Implementation and Regimen Forgivenessmentioning
confidence: 99%